Astronaut’s DNA No Longer Matches His Identical Twin’s After Year Spent in Space, NASA Finds

Dr. Acula

ACCEPT JESUS
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
24,990
Reputation
8,330
Daps
131,873
Astronaut’s DNA No Longer Matches His Identical Twin’s After Year Spent in Space, NASA Finds
ktla.com/2018/03/14/astronauts-dna-no-longer-matches-his-identical-twins-after-year-spent-in-space-nasa-finds
By CNN WireMarch 14, 2018
young.jpg


Spending a year in space not only changes your outlook, it transforms your genes.

Preliminary results from NASA's Twins Study reveal that 7% of astronaut Scott Kelly's genes did not return to normal after his return to Earth two years ago.

The study looks at what happened to Kelly before, during and after he spent one year aboard the International Space Station through an extensive comparison with his identical twin, Mark, who remained on Earth.

NASA has learned that the formerly identical twins are no longer genetically the same.


7:47 PM - Mar 10, 2018

A year in space altered this man's DNA
Seven percent of Scott Kelly's genes did not return to normal when he got home.



'Space genes'
The transformation of 7% of Scott's DNA suggests longer-term changes in genes related to at least five biological pathways and functions.

The newest preliminary results from this unique study of Scott, now retired from NASA, were released at the 2018 Investigator's Workshop for NASA's Human Research Program in January. Last year, NASA published its first round of preliminary results at the 2017 Investigator's Workshop. Overall, the 2018 findings corroborated those from 2017, with some additions.

To track physical changes caused by time in space, scientists measured Scott's metabolites (necessary for maintaining life), cytokines (secreted by immune system cells) and proteins (workhorses within each cell) before, during and after his mission. The researchers learned that spaceflight is associated with oxygen-deprivation stress, increased inflammation and dramatic nutrient shifts that affect gene expression.

In particular, Chris Mason of Weill Cornell Medicine reported on the activation of Scott's "space genes" while confirming the results of his separate NASA study, published last year.

To better understand the genetic dynamics of each twin, Mason and his team focused on chemical changes in RNA and DNA. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that each twin has more than expected unique mutations in his genome -- in fact, hundreds.

Although 93% of Scott's genetic expression returned to normal once he returned to Earth, a subset of several hundred "space genes" remained disrupted. Some of these mutations, found only after spaceflight, are thought to be caused by the stresses of space travel.

As genes turn on and off, change in the function of cells may occur.

Looking to Mars
Mason's work shows that one of the most important changes to Scott's cells was hypoxia, or a deficient amount of tissue oxygenation, probably due to a lack of oxygen and high levels of carbon dioxide. Possible damage to mitochondria, the "power plants of cells," also occurred in Scott's cells, as indicated by mitochondrial stress and increased levels of mitochondria in the blood.

Mason's team also saw changes in the length of Scott's telomeres, caps at the end of chromosomes that are considered a marker of biological aging. First, there was a significant increase in average length while he was in space, and then there was a decrease in length within about 48 hours of his landing on Earth that stabilized to nearly preflight levels. Scientists believe that these telomere changes, along with the DNA damage and DNA repair measured in Scott's cells, were caused by both radiation and calorie restrictions.

Additionally, the team found changes in Scott's collagen, blood clotting and bone formation due, most likely, to fluid shifts and zero gravity. The researchers discovered hyperactive immune activity as well, thought to be the result of his radically different environment: space.
 

Geek Nasty

Brain Knowledgeably Whizzy
Supporter
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
28,219
Reputation
4,064
Daps
106,213
Reppin
South Kakalaka
This is why the space station is so important. We’re learning a lot about living in space for a long time. On another note, this is why I think we need to settle the moon before we try going to Mars. We need to see how humans handle isolation for 18 months when we can get to them in an emergency. Not try launching them into deep space and hoping everything works as planned and they make it back.
 

badboys11

Superstar
Joined
Nov 22, 2016
Messages
4,154
Reputation
865
Daps
13,206
Reppin
M
This is why the space station is so important. We’re learning a lot about living in space for a long time. On another note, this is why I think we need to settle the moon before we try going to Mars. We need to see how humans handle isolation for 18 months when we can get to them in an emergency. Not try launching them into deep space and hoping everything works as planned and they make it back.
i agree. we've established a global satellite network, low earth orbit vehicles and a space station. our next step should be the moon. invest a good a decade to infrastructure and the moons low gravity gives us a base to explore the solar system

leaving the planet could drive a person insane. we have no concept on what the impact of long term space exposure can do to the human body. some people get taller, this article shows changes in our DNA. after a year. what happens after 7 years? can we survive? a base on the moon would help us study. a base on mars can only be resupplied every 3 years.
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
100,608
Reputation
4,877
Daps
201,030
Reppin
NULL
This is why the space station is so important. We’re learning a lot about living in space for a long time. On another note, this is why I think we need to settle the moon before we try going to Mars. We need to see how humans handle isolation for 18 months when we can get to them in an emergency. Not try launching them into deep space and hoping everything works as planned and they make it back.


How would you build a base on the moon? Humans just arnt meant to live in zero gravity
 

FaTaL

Veteran
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
100,608
Reputation
4,877
Daps
201,030
Reppin
NULL
i agree. we've established a global satellite network, low earth orbit vehicles and a space station. our next step should be the moon. invest a good a decade to infrastructure and the moons low gravity gives us a base to explore the solar system

leaving the planet could drive a person insane. we have no concept on what the impact of long term space exposure can do to the human body. some people get taller, this article shows changes in our DNA. after a year. what happens after 7 years? can we survive? a base on the moon would help us study. a base on mars can only be resupplied every 3 years.
Astronauts have had eye problems in space. Just imagine finally arriving at mars and everybody onboard is blind
 
Top