If it ain't Breit(bart) it ain't Right 
How much credibility do you lend a news report that is backed by an anonymous source?
- Thread starter Alpha Male
- Start date
Dafunkdoc_Unlimited
Theological Noncognitivist Since Birth
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2012
- Messages
- 43,073
- Reputation
- 7,982
- Daps
- 118,512
- Reppin
- The Wrong Side of the Tracks
The problem with this thread is the presumption that "Anonymous" = "Fake", "Made-Up", or "non-credible".
As if there could be no possible incentive for a person to hide up their identity while giving critically important information.
It comes down to whether you trust news orgs with a reputation for being credible. If you don't, you end up making whiny threads like the OP. :umadmueller:
As if there could be no possible incentive for a person to hide up their identity while giving critically important information.
It comes down to whether you trust news orgs with a reputation for being credible. If you don't, you end up making whiny threads like the OP. :umadmueller:
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
OP believes an anonymous person called "Q" is leaking all the tea about the Deep State on chan sites right now.
So this dude has a history of calling everything fake news. But hasn’t said shyt about his Nigerian and Haitian comments.
Why is that? The only people claiming fake news are his dikk suckers. But he is quiet as a mouse.
again if you’re black and support this guy, you’re a sucker.
Why is that? The only people claiming fake news are his dikk suckers. But he is quiet as a mouse.
again if you’re black and support this guy, you’re a sucker.
