Incest and necrophilia 'should be legal'

88m3

Fast Money & Foreign Objects
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
91,511
Reputation
3,801
Daps
163,273
Reppin
Brooklyn
'Incest can be considered unusual and disgusting, but the law cannot stem from it being disgusting'

cecilia.jpg

SUF Stockholm president Cecilia Johnsson LUF


Incest between siblings and necrophilia should be legalised, a branch of the Swedish Liberal People's Party has argued.

The Stockholm branch of the party's youth wing (LUF) voted on the controversial motion at its annual meeting on Sunday.

It called for the repeal of several laws to make consensual sex between brothers and sisters aged over 15 legal, as well as allowing people to "bequeath" their bodies for intercourse after death without fearing the perpetrator would be prosecuted.

Stockholm.jpg

The political party's youth wing voted on the motion at a meeting in Stockholm
Cecilia Johnsson, president of LUF Stockholm, toldAftonbladet counter-incest legislation amounted to “morality law”, adding: “These laws protect no one right now”.

“I understand that [incest] can be considered unusual and disgusting, but the law cannot stem from it being disgusting”.

The LUF also voted to support the legalisation of sexual acts with a corpse, on the condition that the person consented while they were still alive.

READ MORE
Ms Johnsson said: “You should get to decide what happens to your body after you die, and if it happens to be that someone wants to bequeath their body to a museum or for research, or if they want to bequeath to someone for sex, then it should be okay.”

The central Liberal People's Party disagreed, however, with spokesperson Adam Alfredsson telling Expressen the proposals were “nothing like the mother party endorses.”

“Incest is and should remain illegal,” he added. “We think it will continue to be illegal to use a dead man’s body in [a sexual] way.”

Meanwhile, a former Swedish Liberal MP, Carl B Hamilton, took to Facebook to dismiss the youth wing's proposals as a publicity stunt concocted by "nitwits".

The Independent has contacted Ms Johnsson for a response.

It is not the first time similar proposals have been raised in Europe.

In 2014, the German Ethics Council also called for an end to the criminalisation of incest between siblings, after examining the case of a man who was jailed for having four children with his sister.

The council argued that the risk of disability in children was not sufficient to warrant a law putting couples in “tragic situations”, and that decriminalising incest would not fuel the spread of the “very rare” practice.

“The majority of the German Ethics Council is of the opinion that it is not appropriate for a criminal law to preserve a social taboo,” a statement said.

A spokeswoman for Angela Merkel's CDU party dismissed the possibility of abolishing criminal punishment at the time.

Incest and necrophilia 'should be legal', according to youth political group


thoughts?
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
75,231
Reputation
26,805
Daps
489,604
Reppin
NULL
if some cac wants to fukk their sister :scust: or some shyt that's consensual then i dont give a fukk what they do behind closed doors. they're already mostly inbred anyway. :skip:

but they advocating fukking dead bodies? why? how the fukk can a dead body consent? :camby:
 

scarlxrd

Underground
Supporter
Joined
Nov 8, 2014
Messages
13,860
Reputation
7,809
Daps
54,606
They already do it.

They just don't want to feel guilty about it :mjlol:

And to think Stockholm is one of the top 10 most technically advanced cities in the entire world. :whew:
 

TheDarceKnight

Veteran
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
29,789
Reputation
13,495
Daps
93,053
Reppin
Jiu Jitsu
I think it's fukking disgusting, and I also think it's interesting that out of all the cultures that have ever existed, incest is basically the only behavior that's always seen in a negative light (learned this in evolutionary psychology/biology.) The belief so far is that incest produces retarded or unhealthy babies, so we are internally wired to think it's disgusting. Regardless, it's gross. And I'm not really for it being legal.

However....

I have never seen an argument for WHY it's disgusting that's been very convincing. I've usually seen them boil down to "well, it just seems very gross on a deep down, gut level" to which I agree. But I do think it's interesting I've never seen someone use logic to say that it's gross

Not to turn this into a philosophical thread or anything.
 
Top