I mean...they literally begged the nikka to stay, it's not like they didn't try to keep him...what else were they supposed to do, offer him a staike in ownership of the team under the table

?
I get that he's FINALLY having a stretch of games where he looks like the player he hasn't been going on 3 seasons, but it doesn't change the fact that the lakers didn't have many options...besides trading one of the icons of your franchise who gave you every ounce of himself out on the court for the better part of 2 decades, and helping you land a billion dollar TV deal, for "draft picks" being uncouth...it was literally impossible...A.) Kobe has a no-trade clause B.) he makes $30million..there is no trade to be made (what contender has $30mil of salary to move, draft picks, and still be a contender?)..so then, basically what you're suggesting is that the lakers amensty one of the greatest players of all time and get absolutely jack squat in return, to placate a guy just turned in a gutless playoff series for you and hadn't been the player you thought he was the whole season...basically, Dwight's not that good...you don't rip out the soul out of a fanbase and city for a Dwight Howard level player...this isn't Lebron we're talking about...him having a week's worth of good games in Houston isn't enough for me to 2nd guess whether they should amnestied one of the GOATs of the franchise...Having Dwight this year wasn't winning us a title or anytime in the foreseeable future...the only path to a realistic chance at being contenders was signing D12 and hoping he'd return to the form he's starting to show now and pray Kobe returned at a close enough to elite level after the achilles injury to make...the other option just sells out a Laker legend, throws this season away and pray for Melo to sign in the summer and hope that Melo/D12 brings rings...