there are tons of oddities in what the Dr. posted without going into the question of the quality of the institutions.
for a start
1. NACES does not do foreign degree credential evaluation. Their member orgs do. He said his letter was from NACES.
2. Theses don't typically look like his screenshot and are not assessed blind in the manner he described. Papers are.
3. You normally start with UG education and build out from there (as a scientist would)
4. He switched from the Haitian university to the associated European/US ones. He did not established that the degrees were actually awarded by the European/US ones so the course evaluations he showed lack connective data.
5. Lots of filler and no summary. Gish-gallop effect.
6. His Duke acceptance letter had no date (it seems). His linkedin does not state that it is continuing.
7. His credential evaluation only needed copies it seems (which is strange). ECE for example requires originals or direct copies from institutions. Link:
Document Requirements - Haiti
8. He lists certifications (from Harvard, Cornell and MIT) under qualifications on his Linked In - which is incorrect. They should be under certs. Also does the same for UCF.
9. Beulah uni is marked for deletion on wikipedia
Beulah Heights University - Wikipedia due to being "not notable". Not sure what that means about the institution itself.
10. He said his quantum thesis made a "out of orthodoxy" claim. That could also mean it is nonsense.
Let a playa play but he clearly isn't as smart as his claimed "qualifications" would suggest.
He said he is "not going to defend himself again" so has a convo / thought stopper excuse in place already.
One of my early degrees is not on my ex uni's website any longer (because the courses have changed) so I wouldn't hold that against him.
Cam did not do a structured breakdown either, which made it easier for the dr. to mount a defense.
Cam needs to get Excel out (well Libre Office), list all of the quals in chronological order and address them one by one.
