Changing a starting lineup != changing your entire approach to the game lolThey were doing just fine until of course they lost.
The Cavs had no offense breh. Their offense after Kyrie went down was Bron pounding the ball into the ground for 20 seconds and missing a shot or passing it somebody else to miss and then getting the board and doing the same thing again. Mosgov got nailed to the bench after Bogut got nailed to the bench for not putting up a fight inside. The Warriors changed a starting lineup that won them 67 games and 3 playoff rounds because the Cavs were sacrificing their offense and gambling.
If none of the other options would have worked any better, what exactly is the point of discussing them? So you think a team that struggled to score would have had similar issues with two 20 point scorers added?
You'd have a point if you said that the Warriors suddenly went to a zone defense or something... Bogut was redundant. All there was to it.
Mozgov got nailed to the bench because he was a net negative overall. Couldn't help guard anyone that mattered. Clogged the lane. Couldn't initiate any offense on his own. Mozgov got more touches in that one game than he ever did through his career - that's a perfect example of a desperate team throwing shyt at the wall hoping something sticks.
"Cavs had no offense" because they played one of the best defenses the league had seen in years. But that's just another example of people giving the Warriors no credit.
.
.
.Beyond that you do realize that GSW wants to play at a faster pace right. Slowing the pace down would certainly not be something they willing played any part in.