2024 Moon Visit Delayed? NASA Artemis Program cuts short ground test of its giant moon rocket

null

...
Joined
Nov 12, 2014
Messages
31,338
Reputation
5,479
Daps
49,161
Reppin
UK, DE, GY, DMV
000_8YX28H.jpg


US: NASA cuts short ground test of its giant moon rocket


The test is a vital step in NASA’s Artemis programme to put the first woman and the next man on the Moon in 2024.

US space agency NASA ignited all four engines of its giant Space Launch System (SLS) for the first time on Saturday, but the “hot fire” test ended much earlier than expected.



Mounted in a test facility at NASA’s Stennis Space Center in the state of Mississippi, the SLS’s 65-metre-tall (212-foot) core stage roared to life at 4:27pm local time (22:27 GMT) and burned for more than a minute before the exercise was aborted.

The test was supposed to last for eight minutes to simulate the rocket’s climb to orbit.

NASA said in a statement that its teams were “assessing the data to determine what caused the early shutdown”.

‘Important milestone’
It was unclear whether Boeing and NASA would have to repeat Saturday’s test, a prospect that could push the SLS’s debut launch into 2022.

Speaking to reporters following the test, SLS Program Manager John Honeycut said it was hard to detect what exactly went wrong. He said they had seen a flash in a thermal protection blanket on one of the engines and were analysing the data.

And despite the test being cut short, NASA Administrator Jim Bridenstine said the firing of the RS-25 engines had provided valuable information for the planned missions.

“I know not everybody is feeling as happy as we otherwise could because we wanted to get eight minutes of a hot fire and we got over a minute, but I just want to remind people where we’ve been and where we’re going and what an important milestone this is,” he told reporters.

He added: “We got lots of data that we’re going to be able to sort through,” to determine if a do-over is needed and whether a November 2021 debut launch date is still possible.

In addition to Artemis I, two other missions are planned. The first mission will test the SLS and an unmanned Orion spacecraft, while Artemis II will take astronauts around the Moon in 2023 but it will not land. Astronauts will only be sent to the Moon during the third mission in 2024.

The SLS, in its configuration for Artemis I, will stand 98 metres (322 feet), taller than the Statue of Liberty, and is more powerful than the Saturn V rockets used in the Apollo missions.

The rocket is now three years behind schedule and nearly $3bn over budget.

Critics have long argued for NASA to retire the rocket’s shuttle-era core technologies, which have launch costs of $1bn or more per mission, in favour of newer commercial alternatives that promise lower costs.

By comparison, it costs as little as $90m to fly the massive, but less powerful, Falcon Heavy rocket designed and manufactured by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, and some $350m per launch for United Launch Alliance’s legacy Delta IV Heavy.

While newer, more reusable rockets from both companies – SpaceX’s Starship and United Launch Alliance’s Vulcan – promise heavier lift capacity than the Falcon Heavy or Delta IV Heavy, potentially at a lower cost, SLS backers have argued it would take two or more launches on those rockets to launch what the SLS could carry in a single mission.

NASA’s eventual goal is to establish an Artemis Base Camp on the Moon before the end of the decade, an ambitious plan that would require tens of billions of dollars in funding and a green light from President-elect Joe Biden and Congress.

A manned return to the Moon is the first part of the Artemis programme to set up a long-term colony and test technologies for a crewed mission to Mars in the 2030s

US: NASA cuts short ground test of its giant moon rocket



NASA: Artemis
Artemis program - Wikipedia
 

CopiousX

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 15, 2019
Messages
13,052
Reputation
4,258
Daps
63,784
I'm pretty sure the new administration will shut this sht down with the quickness. Economic conditions are similar to to the 08 crash, so I imagine they could get a decent approval bump by defunding nasa again like in the Obama years.:patrice:



As a government entity, I dont think the US is sending people to Mars anytime soon. Its entirely up to Elon to do everything himself:wow:
 

Swirv

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jul 1, 2012
Messages
17,489
Reputation
2,999
Daps
55,241
I’m more disappointed the insight probe could’ve drill through Martian soil to find out the temperature of Mars core
 

Whore D'oeuvres

Still Trippin
Supporter
Joined
Sep 23, 2015
Messages
1,120
Reputation
514
Daps
5,073
Reppin
Soufside
Who cares? US needs to defund NASA as much as possible. The whole organization is founded upon expensive curiosity and beating the Soviet Union. Spending billions to essentially "see what's out there"

Wanna spend billions to go back to the moon and can't even contain a virus. Cacs wanna explore and can't even keep the Earth in a healthy, liveable, and fair shape. As any OG will tell you TAKE CARE OF HOME FIRST:pacspit:
 
Top