[5/1] WWE Payback Thread: I Can Dig Rapping, I Can Dig Scrapping, But I Can't Dig Backstabbing

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,356
Reputation
6,414
Daps
115,061
Reppin
Chile
How you figure? They put Reigns with a bunch of great, seasoned workers that are tasked with carrying him and putting him over, they also come up with a bunch of transparent fukkery to get Roman rests during long matches because he cant otherwise wrestle long matches, they sell and protect his finishers, have him win clean, everyone is specifically told to make Roman look strong, all in an effort to convince people that he's good. You watch all this and come to the conclusion that he's good, but it has nothing to do with WWE's plans to do exactly that? :heh:

Actually the finishes to his matches are one of things I don't like about him. Probably because I hate the spear as finisher.

Putting your next big star against talented workers is exactly what they should do, that's the only way a 4 year wrestler is gonna learn how to become good. And he has does exactly that. 2013 and most of 2014 Roman wasn't all that good in the ring and he also had singles matches against talented people during that period (including Daniel Bryan). By 2015 he learned how to make a decent comeback, how to use facial expressions and how to sell, those are three things I like about the guy and don't have much to do with what you saying. I could care less he's made to look strong. I've liked what I've seen from him against Show and Wyatt too and those aren't elite at anything at this point. Brock hasn't had a singles match nearly as good as the one he had at Mania against Roman, same with Sheamus.

I'm not saying Roman is elite, I'm saying the dude is good. And a good worker is gonna have great matches when he's paired with talented people and they are given time. The notion that he's been carried so many times is funny as fukk because I've never read that excuse about anyone else. When someone is having entertaining matches against such a variety of opponents people tend to give that wrestler the benefit of the doubt at least :heh:.
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,356
Reputation
6,414
Daps
115,061
Reppin
Chile
tumblr_o6ivm7lJca1u1ljrzo1_540.gif

:wow:

"I'M DUMB AS FUUUCK TIIIIIIIIIIIIMEEEEEEEE!"

:wow:
 

Jmare007

pico pal q lee
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
47,356
Reputation
6,414
Daps
115,061
Reppin
Chile
I've now seen that Diesel having good matches with good wrestlers meant he sucked, and Roman having good matches with good wrestlers means he sucks. That shyt makes no sense. A good wrestler can't carry a shytty wrestler to a good match. It can't be done. If a dude is consistently having good-great matches with good-great talent, that means he's good-great as well.

EXACTLY!
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
57,687
Reputation
9,630
Daps
178,145
Anybody else think Roman was turning during that match?

The first count out DQ didn't draw any suspicion. But then the 2nd DQ from the low blow was odd and seemed like he was trying to get DQ'd. And then afterwards it seemed like he had a different look on his face
 

GoddamnyamanProf

Countdown to Armageddon
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
35,793
Reputation
878
Daps
106,213
A good wrestler can't carry a shytty wrestler to a good match. It can't be done.

The notion that he's been carried so many times is funny as fukk because I've never read that excuse about anyone else.
These two statements are just...idk, something that someone who has no idea about wrestling might say. These are things that are SO common and have happened SO many times, WWE has basically built their history on this practice, and you two say you've never seen it and/or its impossible. :dead: Okay
 
Top