5 Ways Capitalist Chile is Much Better Than Socialist Venezuela

Street Knowledge

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
27,884
Reputation
2,768
Daps
67,306
Reppin
NYC
5 Ways Capitalist Chile is Much Better Than Socialist Venezuela
5 Ways Capitalist Chile is Much Better Than Socialist Venezuela

The story of Chile’s success starts in the mid-1970s, when Chile’s military government abandoned socialism and started to implement economic reforms. In 2013, Chile was the world’s 10th freest economy. Venezuela, in the meantime, declined from being the world’s 10th freest economy in 1975 to being the world’s least free economy in 2013 (Human Progress does not have data for the notoriously unfree North Korea).

cv1.jpg


1. As economic freedom increased, so did income per capita (adjusted for inflation and purchasing power parity), which rose from being 31 percent of that in Venezuela to being 138 percent of that in Venezuela. Between 1975 and 2015, the Chilean economy grew by 287 percent. Venezuela’s shrunk by 12 percent.

cv2.jpg


2. As its economy expanded, so did Chile’s ability to provide good health care for its people. In 1975, Chile’s infant mortality rate was 33 percent higher than Venezuela’s. In 2015, almost twice as many infants died in Venezuela as those who died in Chile.

cv3.jpg


3. With declining infant mortality and improving standard of living came a steady increase in life expectancy. In 1975, Venezuelans lived longer than Chileans. In 2014, a typical Chilean lived over 7 years longer than the average citizen of the Bolivarian Republic.

cv4.jpg


4. Moreover, more Chileans of both sexes survive to old age than they do in Venezuela. As they enter their retirement, the people of Chile enjoy a private social security system that was put into place by Cato’s distinguished senior fellow Jose Pinera. The system generates an average return of 10 percent per year (rather than the paltry 2 percent generated by the state-run social security system in the United States).

cv5.jpg


cv7.jpg


5. Last, but not least, as the people of Chile grew richer, they started demanding more say in the running of their country. Starting in the late 1980s, the military gradually and peacefully handed power over to democratically-elected representatives. In Venezuela, the opposite has happened. As failure of socialism became more apparent, the government had to resort to ever more repressive measures in order to keep itself in power—just as Friedrich Hayek predicted.

cv6.jpg
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
Similar patterns all over the world, and throughout time. Liberals will come up with some reason as to why it isn't the government structure. Then point to their white heroes in Europe. Europe earned their position through world conquests, 1000+ years of intra continental warfare, famine, plagues, religious reform and internal technological development. Other countries can't just magically become Europe.

Look at Chile, Hong kong, singapore, new zealand, Australia, and then look at North Korea, laos, Venezuela, Cuba. The different is like night and day. I don't understand why people believe a middle path is the best.
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
Chile has its own issues...
:ld:


The numbers, if accurate, speak for themselves.


Authoritarian capitalism is the right path as proven by singapore and the Chinese/Russian transition. Pinochet is the villain of college campuses nation-wide, but look at the clean streets of singapore. A country that is to the right on everything-economics and social issues--is the ideal.
 

CHL

Superstar
Joined
Jul 6, 2014
Messages
13,456
Reputation
1,480
Daps
19,583
The numbers, if accurate, speak for themselves.


Authoritarian capitalism is the right path as proven by singapore and the Chinese/Russian transition. Pinochet is the villain of college campuses nation-wide, but look at the clean streets of singapore. A country that is to the right on everything-economics and social issues--is the ideal.
So this ideal State that's right wing on social issues would be extremely harsh on crime right?

How do you think they would deal with people who pull guns on women?
 

plushcarpet

Superstar
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
3,536
Reputation
445
Daps
13,032
Authoritarian capitalism is the right path as proven by singapore and the Chinese/Russian transition. Pinochet is the villain of college campuses nation-wide, but look at the clean streets of singapore. A country that is to the right on everything-economics and social issues--is the ideal.

Nonsense, free-market capitalism regulated by a small constitutional republic is the right path

you can't point to china and russia but leave out the US, the best example of capitalism that has ever existed :mjlol:
 

Camile.Bidan

Banned
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
1,973
Reputation
-1,756
Daps
2,325
So this ideal State that's right wing on social issues would be extremely harsh on crime right?

How do you think they would deal with people who pull guns on women?

Appropriately, with jail time, lashing or other forms of punishment.

Drug deAlers get the death penalty in Singapore, and I agree with that. I also sold drugs as a teenager as well possessed guns. I was enabled by liberal policies that allowed crime to flourish. If I was in a place like singapore, I wouldnt have risked something like that.
 
Top