8-6-15 GOP Faux News Debate Thread 8:50pm EST

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,559
Reputation
-11,383
Daps
154,725
Reppin
Inches
I wanna stab u I dont for a dem or a republican n1ggaz.

A Republican get in there and blow up the damn world, then what:damn:

The false equivalency kills me
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
800
Daps
15,042
Obama's been soft but he signed Dodd Frank and wall st hates it. He established the consumer protection Bureau, wall st hates that. W/ oversight under his admin, he's fined numerous financial institutions. U think a Republican would do any of this :dahell:


On another note, Im worried brehs, Hillary looks like she has no fight in her. Her and Bill look so old and tired. :lupe:

Dodd-Frank is ok, not nearly enough. You understand that these banks were making 10s of billions of dollars from these scams, them dropping 1 billion to buy their freedom isn't shyt. Obama literally picked an attorney general who had written a manifesto on why banks should be above the law and had spent the better part of a decade working for the same bankers he was now in charge of policing(who, btw, he went back to working for immediately after he left office). His entire justice department was and is filled with the same type of people.

Wall Street has hit all time highs under Obama, no one has gone to jail; I think they're ok with his presidency.

Edit: and as to a republican doing anything to Wall Street, Rick Perry has come out with some pretty harsh ideas for Wall Street. Obama being a democrat doesn't shield him from criticism on Wall Street anymore than Bill Clinton being a democrat shields him from criticism on mass incarceration and race baiting.
 

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,559
Reputation
-11,383
Daps
154,725
Reppin
Inches
Dodd-Frank is ok, not nearly enough. You understand that these banks were making 10s of billions of dollars from these scams, them dropping 1 billion to buy their freedom isn't shyt. Obama literally picked an attorney general who had written a manifesto on why banks should be above the law and had spent the better part of a decade working for the same bankers he was now in charge of policing(who, btw, he went back to working for immediately after he left office). His entire justice department was and is filled with the same type of people.

Wall Street has hit all time highs under Obama, no one has gone to jail; I think they're ok with his presidency.

Edit: and as to a republican doing anything to Wall Street, Rick Perry has come out with some pretty harsh ideas for Wall Street. Obama being a democrat doesn't shield him from criticism on Wall Street anymore than Bill Clinton being a democrat shields him from criticism on mass incarceration and race baiting.
Rick Perry. This n1gga said Rick perry :mjlol:
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
800
Daps
15,042

Tony D'Amato

It's all about the inches
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
65,559
Reputation
-11,383
Daps
154,725
Reppin
Inches
Rick Perry’s radical proposal to put Wall Street in its place

Rick Perry: Wall Street 'screwed' average Americans, Clintons responsible

Note that puts him pretty squarely in the Bernie Sanders/Elizabeth Warren mold on this. Well to the 'left' of Hiliary, Obama, Chuck Schumer, etc.
The point was, I don't care what his views on Wallstreet are. I wouldnt want him to be my mayor much less my president. Who cares what he'll do to wall st when he'll expand the military, start a war as soon az he's sworn in. His justice dept wouldnt even look into a police shooting. He doesnt even believe in global warming. I could go on.

Another false equivalency. Hillary's good outweighs her bad. Especially when u consider the alternative is going to be a lunatic.
 

Tate

Kae☭ernick Loyalist
Joined
Aug 3, 2015
Messages
4,274
Reputation
800
Daps
15,042
The point was, I don't care what his views on Wallstreet are. I wouldnt want him to be my mayor much less my president. Who cares what he'll do to wall st when he'll expand the military, start a war as soon az he's sworn in. His justice dept wouldnt even look into a police shooting. He doesnt even believe in global warming. I could go on.

Another false equivalency. Hillary's good outweighs her bad. Especially when u consider the alternative is going to be a lunatic.

Never said Perry or any republican was preferable to Clinton. However that's no reason to give her or Barack a pass on Wall Street.

I personally won't vote for her because I don't live in a swing state. I would if I lived in Ohio or Florida I would but it doesn't do me any good to waste my vote on a corporate democrat when I could better shown my support for more left wing politics by voting for a Green or Socialist party.
 

Lakers Offseason

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
6,393
Reputation
995
Daps
12,793
Reppin
NULL
Dodd-Frank is ok, not nearly enough. You understand that these banks were making 10s of billions of dollars from these scams, them dropping 1 billion to buy their freedom isn't shyt. Obama literally picked an attorney general who had written a manifesto on why banks should be above the law and had spent the better part of a decade working for the same bankers he was now in charge of policing(who, btw, he went back to working for immediately after he left office). His entire justice department was and is filled with the same type of people.

Wall Street has hit all time highs under Obama, no one has gone to jail; I think they're ok with his presidency.

Edit: and as to a republican doing anything to Wall Street, Rick Perry has come out with some pretty harsh ideas for Wall Street. Obama being a democrat doesn't shield him from criticism on Wall Street anymore than Bill Clinton being a democrat shields him from criticism on mass incarceration and race baiting.


Income inequality has widen under Obama:heh:
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,343
Daps
118,853
:what:Defend by talking? Having tea? Saying the military purpose is to kill people and break things isn't an outlandish statement.
I never said we where using the military correctly im talking about there intended purpose.
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2014
Messages
20,536
Reputation
726
Daps
82,946
I never said we where using the military correctly im talking about there intended purpose.
you said the intended purpose is to defend, as if there is any other way to defend a nation from a threat other than to take that threat out.
 

hayesc0

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
38,507
Reputation
8,343
Daps
118,853
you said the intended purpose is to defend, as if there is any other way to defend a nation from a threat other than to take that threat out.
:snoop: You think the only way to defend is to take a threat out the military often times works better as a deterrent then an actually fighting force didn't know this was a secret hints the word defend.
 
Top