Active shooter, hostage situation at veterans facility in Yountville prompts lockdown, large police

wickedsm

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,567
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,600
88m3 said:
A lot of them, dating back to WWII, and the largest veterans home in the country....


:leostare:
Click to expand...

i fukking hate this.
have yall ever talked to or read about the ww2 vets? i have many times
wonderful people. truly the greatest generation.
somewhere around here i have a book of love letters from WW2 service members to their boos
:mjcry:

and now we wait for Rs and the NRA to disparage these heroes
i can see it from here


some deflect change the subject bullshyt.
ptsd yadda yadda blame this that or the other not us!

what the fukk kind of shythole is this country that we dont take care of our children, our elderly and our vets????
:pacspit::pacspit::pacspit:
 
Orbital-Fetus

Orbital-Fetus

cross that bridge
Supporter
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
41,326
Reputation
18,653
Daps
151,837
Reppin
Humanity
mc_brew said:
We have armed guards protect our banks and jewelry stores, why are those places more important than our veteran care facilities? We absolutely must arm every nurse and doctor and janitor there.
Click to expand...

so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.

i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.

miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.

a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
their solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.

that is a problem that we must addressed in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.

the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it.
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.

or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.


i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would outweigh the demonstrable downside of the status quo.

"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will stop people form dying.
 
Last edited:
wickedsm

wickedsm

Auntie Mozelle
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2015
Messages
14,567
Reputation
12,760
Daps
92,600
Orbital-Fetus said:
so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.

i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.

miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.

a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.

that is a problem that we must address in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.

the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it.
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.

or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.


i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would out way the demonstrable downside of the status quo.

"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will.
Click to expand...


*appluase*
 
ExodusNirvana

ExodusNirvana

Change is inevitable...
Joined
Jun 6, 2012
Messages
41,974
Reputation
9,574
Daps
153,543
Reppin
Brooklyn, NY
Orbital-Fetus said:
so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.

i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.

miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.

a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.

that is a problem that we must address in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.

the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it.
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.

or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.


i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would outweigh the demonstrable downside of the status quo.

"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will.
Click to expand...
:wow:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top