i fukking hate this.
have yall ever talked to or read about the ww2 vets? i have many times
wonderful people. truly the greatest generation.
somewhere around here i have a book of love letters from WW2 service members to their boos
and now we wait for Rs and the NRA to disparage these heroes
i can see it from here
some deflect change the subject bullshyt.
ptsd yadda yadda blame this that or the other not us!
what the fukk kind of shythole is this country that we dont take care of our children, our elderly and our vets????
![]()
so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.
i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.
miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.
a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
their solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.
that is a problem that we must addressed in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.
the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it.
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.
or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.
i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would outweigh the demonstrable downside of the status quo.
"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will stop people form dying.
Suspected gunman, 3 women found dead after hostages taken at Calif. veterans home
all the hostages(staff) died
![]()
give the doctors and nurses guns.
![]()
We have armed guards protect our banks and jewelry stores, why are those places more important than our veteran care facilities? We absolutely must arm every nurse and doctor and janitor there.
so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.
i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.
miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.
a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
their solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.
that is a problem that we must addressed in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.
the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.
or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.
i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would outweigh the demonstrable downside of the status quo.
"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will stop people form dying.
while we are cutting through the sarcasm, let's be honest, most white people want guns in society because they see it as guns protect them from blacks and blacks are killing each other with guns... if guns were banned in society (not saying they can be or that anyone was seriously proposing that) then white people would be scared to death of what they think blacks would do to them and the black on black death toll would drop dramatically....so i'm gonna cut through the sarcasm and just say what i mean.
i do not believe that teachers, docs, nurses, janitors should be armed in response to mass shootings.
the best protection against this phenomenon is removing auto and semi auto rifles from the civilian population.
i believe that our institutions are strong enough to prevent the potential tierney of an administration from
fully turning on the population to the point that AR's need to be in the hands of civilians.
miss me with the "regulated militia" shyt.
what the fukk is your militia gonna do against the military if shyt really gets that crazy?
in the mean time you have non-stop mass murder.
a military subjugation of the american public writ large is not possible.
our military would never turn on the american public.
what we do have to worry about is the militarization of the police.
this is how they get around not being able to use the military on american soil.
their solution: give the police military equipment and tactics.
that is a problem that we must addressed in the realm of law and public opinion.
the results of police abuse are felt mostly by minorities and the poor and they are not spending money to propagate the gun agenda.
the people who are least oppressed by the state are the ones who want the most protection from it.
they are sitting on the sidelines watching poor, brown people get fukked in the ass by police with military gear and don't want it to happen to them.
so they want more guns.
or they are afraid of the people who are being abused by militarized police and want to have the same gear or better.
i don't have an AR, i have never really wanted one but i have to admit that they are cool as fukk and i would love to have a ton of them.
but i don't think that my enjoyment of owning it would outweigh the demonstrable downside of the status quo.
"thoughts and prayers" aint gonna bring back dead people.
getting rid of weapons that were made to kill people will stop people form dying.
that was sarcasm.... wayne lapierre's position is we should arm teachers because we have armed guards protecting other valuables in society.... he says by not arming teachers we as a society are saying our children aren't that important... you and i know that is deflection and bullshyt, but that is the position of the right.....How often do you actually see an armed guard at a bank?