some would argue that the civil rights movement is the sole reason that the hart-celler act was passed in the first placeThe Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 did not make it fully illegal for the United States government to discriminate against individuals, which included members of the LGBTQ+ community to be prohibited under the legislation.[15] The Immigration and Naturalization Service continued to deny entry to prospective immigrants who are in the LGBTQ+ community on the grounds that they were "mentally defective", or had a "constitutional psychopathic inferiority"


what does any of this have to do with anythingGodfrey pandering, as usual.
Jewish donors backed lobbies and politicians to reverse the mid 1920s Immigration restriction laws. In much the same way that Trump is using "them" "poisoning our blood" language 100 years later, those laws were put in place to keep Southern and Eastern European "others" from changing the white Western European Protestant fabric of America.
Those restrictions literally closed the door on people from countries that US lawmakers considered undesirables.
The donors backed new laws to open up immigration so that their cousins could flee the Eastern European countries they were in. So, 40 years after the restrictions were put in, new Immigration legislation was enacted.
And "chain migration" was encouraged, where relatives of American citizens were given priority to enter the country. Their transition would be easier, and they would assimilate quicker was the reasoning.
All of this has been on the public record for decades now. Its related to the CRM to the extent that some of the same donors backed both efforts. Non Black donors backed the CRM largely for self serving interests. That movement fought to remove legal restrictions to education, housing, and employment against people who werent White male Protestants. Those restrictions effectively blocked access and protections to the same southern and eastern euro origin "others" mentioned earlier.
Godfrey, and everybody who has studied/read about 20th century politics knows this.

what does any of this have to do with anything![]()
Godfrey pandering, as usual.
Jewish donors backed lobbies and politicians to reverse the mid 1920s Immigration restriction laws. In much the same way that Trump is using "them" "poisoning our blood" language 100 years later, those laws were put in place to keep Southern and Eastern European "others" from changing the white Western European Protestant fabric of America.
Those restrictions literally closed the door on people from countries that US lawmakers considered undesirables.
The donors backed new laws to open up immigration so that their cousins could flee the Eastern European countries they were in. So, 40 years after the restrictions were put in, new Immigration legislation was enacted.
And "chain migration" was encouraged, where relatives of American citizens were given priority to enter the country. Their transition would be easier, and they would assimilate quicker was the reasoning.
All of this has been on the public record for decades now. Its related to the CRM to the extent that some of the same donors backed both efforts. Non Black donors backed the CRM largely for self serving interests. That movement fought to remove legal restrictions to education, housing, and employment against people who werent White male Protestants. Those restrictions effectively blocked access and protections to the same southern and eastern euro origin "others" mentioned earlier.
Godfrey, and everybody who has studied/read about 20th century politics knows this.
Godfrey pandering, as usual.
Jewish donors backed lobbies and politicians to reverse the mid 1920s Immigration restriction laws. In much the same way that Trump is using "them" "poisoning our blood" language 100 years later, those laws were put in place to keep Southern and Eastern European "others" from changing the white Western European Protestant fabric of America.
Those restrictions literally closed the door on people from countries that US lawmakers considered undesirables.
The donors backed new laws to open up immigration so that their cousins could flee the Eastern European countries they were in. So, 40 years after the restrictions were put in, new Immigration legislation was enacted.
And "chain migration" was encouraged, where relatives of American citizens were given priority to enter the country. Their transition would be easier, and they would assimilate quicker was the reasoning.
All of this has been on the public record for decades now. Its related to the CRM to the extent that some of the same donors backed both efforts. Non Black donors backed the CRM largely for self serving interests. That movement fought to remove legal restrictions to education, housing, and employment against people who werent White male Protestants. Those restrictions effectively blocked access and protections to the same southern and eastern euro origin "others" mentioned earlier.
Godfrey, and everybody who has studied/read about 20th century politics knows this.