I mean geez whiz. Its clear as day, but some people still aint tryna hear it 

I disagreeNeh, 03 betta
If you disagree you gay and an idiot and got no hoes
Neh, 03 betta
If you disagree you gay and an idiot and got no hoes
second this. op is a faq and an idiot and got no hoes
lol you are right about it not being even close but wrong about the year. 1996>>>200303 by far
Not even close
I just see 96 as being deeper when you hit the second level while 03 and 84 was better at the top.84 Hakeem, Jordan, Barkley, Robertson, Willis, Stockton, Perkins,
96 AI, Kobe, Marbury, Ray Allen, Nash, Peja, Jermaine O'Neal, Ben Wallace and
03 Bron, Melo, Bosh, Wade, David West, Kyle Korver
It really is hard to call. The 03 draft still has some legs left.
84 Hakeem, Jordan, Barkley, Robertson, Willis, Stockton, Perkins,
96 AI, Kobe, Marbury, Ray Allen, Nash, Peja, Jermaine O'Neal, Ben Wallace and
03 Bron, Melo, Bosh, Wade, David West, Kyle Korver
It really is hard to call. The 03 draft still has some legs left.
84 Hakeem, Jordan, Barkley, Robertson, Willis, Stockton, Perkins,
96 AI, Kobe, Marbury, Ray Allen, Nash, Peja, Jermaine O'Neal, Ben Wallace and
03 Bron, Melo, Bosh, Wade, David West, Kyle Korver
It really is hard to call. The 03 draft still has some legs left.
How was 03 better at top?I just see 96 as being deeper when you hit the second level while 03 and 84 was better at the top.
96 also had Antoine Walker, Shareef Adbur Rahim, Big Z who all were all stars at one point. I'd take 96 over all but definitely wouldn't be mad if somebody took 84 considering you had 4 players taken that are arguably top 3 at their position all time or at worst top 6. It just lacked much depth outside of the top four players outside of Hakeem, Jordan, Barkley, and Stockton.