Alabama church quotes Hitler on billboard

[NotaPAWG]

this dude @Truth200 was in that Travis Scott x Mike Brown interview thread defending his avi being a Nordic Skull..saying it's a skateboard logo.. yet dude is acting REAL questionable in this thread


@BarNone @Matt504

Exactly, America is the most Anti-Nazi country on Earth.


Matter a fact the US is the only country who really protects Israel and Jews.

this is the dumbest shyt, you've said on here.. and that says a lot considering all the other dumb shyt you've said on here, like prior to ww2 isn't worth discussion.

the U.S being pro-israel and very protective of jews, don't mean we're the most "anti-nazi" country on earth.

and Nazis didn't just kill jews. it made up a lot of their and Hitler's hate, but they weren't the only ones Hitler killed and wanted dead.

get your head out of your ass.

 

[YouMadd?]

hitler dragged germany into a war they couldn't win and then blamed it on the populace when they lost.


the nazi party never even won a majority of seats in any election before they took power through riots, intimidation, and subversive backroom deals


napoleon was a corsican military officer who exercised a vendetta against the existing french elite and happened to have the resources to do so and more. never did he intend to exterminate groups of people because of their bloodlines and ethnicities

yall dudes have never actually read about modern european history have you

it's as if hitler is the first one to say that youth are important for the future what a novel idea, people that will be around longer than the rest of us will control the direction of the world

Exactly....

 

[YouMadd?]

Also, these good ole boys in MS should be embarrassed, they probably had relatives that fought against Hitler...

 

[Truth200]

The comments to the video are interesting, had me googling quite a bit. Its odd reading virulent racist though support Farakhan to the point where I imagine them getting starry eyed on some "don't you dare call him the honorable mister that! "

Farrakhan is the only leader left who really stands for the underclass and oppressed people in America.

He also stands against the slaughter of thousands of children in Gaza.

 

[Truth200]

this dude @Truth200 was in that Travis Scott x Mike Brown interview thread defending his avi being a Nordic Skull..saying it's a skateboard logo.



the U.S being pro-israel and very protective of jews, don't mean we're the most "anti-nazi" country on earth..

I changed my Avatar to a new skateboard logo if that makes you happy.

And yes America is the most Anti-Nazi country on Earth i stand by what i said.

The US is the country who fought to stop the Nazi in WW2 and the only country who still protects Israel to this day.

My Grandfather was a paratrooper for the US Army in WW2.

@biscuitsnbangers whats wrong with you? whats your problem?

 

[notPsychosiz]

Exactly....

hitler dragged germany into a war they couldn't win and then blamed it on the populace when they lost.


the nazi party never even won a majority of seats in any election before they took power through riots, intimidation, and subversive backroom deals


napoleon was a corsican military officer who exercised a vendetta against the existing french elite and happened to have the resources to do so and more. never did he intend to exterminate groups of people because of their bloodlines and ethnicities

yall dudes have never actually read about modern european history have you

it's as if hitler is the first one to say that youth are important for the future what a novel idea, people that will be around longer than the rest of us will control the direction of the world

Check your history books again, fam.

Hitler served in WW1.
When the german troops were recalled by the german leadership due to the surrender many resented the surrender because they felt the war was very winnable.
It was precluded that WW2 would occur at the end of WW1 based on concessions Germany was forced to make durring the truce signing that had not been agreed upon by leadership, but the troops were already pulled out so the germans had no negotiating power. One of those concessions let the other countries govern how many troops germany could have.
This is why Hitler was able to rise to power. His own army of 'unofficial' reservists and volunteers outpaced the national army because a handful of countrues (what would later become Nato) was mettling in the german governments affairs by restricting their official powers and how many troops they could garrison.

It wasn't riots and overthrows, a better analogy would be like on those cop shows when the local branch is doing something then the fbi and cia shows up and their leader does that "We're in charge now" speech cause they have more resources so the local cop moves over, though resents it.

The original Nazi party wasn't even a military party at all, it was barely even a political party.
It was basically a union. (National Socialist German Workers Party)
The military and political stuff it did lasted like 10% of its history as an organization but thats what it became known for so in hindsight thats what people assume it was there to do all along.

You sound like my niece. All she knows of Flavor Flav is from reality TV. He was on tv like 5 years, tops. He has a music career that spans 2, 3 decades but she knows none of that. If you are looking at WW2 and not starting from at least WW1 you will never have a good context on it.

 

[dennis roadman]

Check your history books again, fam.

Hitler served in WW1.
When the german troops were recalled by the german leadership due to the surrender many resented the surrender because they felt the war was very winnable.
It was precluded that WW2 would occur at the end of WW1 based on concessions Germany was forced to make durring the truce signing that had not been agreed upon by leadership, but the troops were already pulled out so the germans had no negotiating power. One of those concessions let the other countries govern how many troops germany could have.
This is why Hitler was able to rise to power. His own army of 'unofficial' reservists and volunteers outpaced the national army because a handful of countrues (what would later become Nato) was mettling in the german governments affairs by restricting their official powers and how many troops they could garrison.

It wasn't riots and overthrows, a better analogy would be like on those cop shows when the local branch is doing something then the fbi and cia shows up and their leader does that "We're in charge now" speech cause they have more resources so the local cop moves over, though resents it.

The original Nazi party wasn't even a military party at all, it was barely even a political party.
It was basically a union. (National Socialist German Workers Party)
The military and political stuff it did lasted like 10% of its history as an organization but thats what it became known for so in hindsight thats what people assume it was there to do all along.

You sound like my niece. All she knows of Flavor Flav is from reality TV. He was on tv like 5 years, tops. He has a music career that spans 2, 3 decades but she knows none of that. If you are looking at WW2 and not starting from at least WW1 you will never have a good context on it.

breh..

please gtfo with you telling me i sound like your niece and making flavor flav analogies while talking about the "stab in the back" myth and the treaty of versailles concessions like you're uncovering some hidden nugget of 20th century european history for me.

none of what you said disputes my point anyway. hitler gained notoriety in germany and thus support in right wing circles because of the beer hall putsch. hitler went to jail because it failed, wrote mein kampf and came back with a militaristic vision of the NSDAP.

10% of its history? it was a party of humps that screamed at each other in lowly lit backrooms before hitler took over. no shyt people remember it for him.

 

[the cac mamba]

i can tell you're not really a teacher at all

 

[notPsychosiz]

breh..

please gtfo with you telling me i sound like your niece and making flavor flav analogies while talking about the "stab in the back" myth and the treaty of versailles concessions like you're uncovering some hidden nugget of 20th century european history for me.

none of what you said disputes my point anyway. hitler gained notoriety in germany and thus support in right wing circles because of the beer hall putsch. hitler went to jail because it failed, wrote mein kampf and came back with a militaristic vision of the NSDAP.

10% of its history? it was a party of humps that screamed at each other in lowly lit backrooms before hitler took over. no shyt people remember it for him.

Well now. Thats a rather long and condescending way of saying I am right.

They were not rioting to gain power as you indicated. They had the power defacto by having the numbers.
And no one in the know believes the treaty of versalles is a hidden nugget. I only remind you of it because you proposed that hitler dragged germany into the war. The very same war that anyone aware of that treaty could have told you was coming before the ink was dry.

I only assumed you were not aware of it because to know about it and still pretend Hitler dragged germany into war... well, that would take you from naive to something more sinister.

But since you seem to have a grasp of treaties, let me ask you this. I would say that most of the attrocities that Hitler is known for basically boil down to the dispute between Russia/Germany over their respective stances on the Hague Convention treaties. Had both been signatories to all items WW2 would have been much smoother and all the war crime stuff would be out the window. I don't think they could have rolled out executing prisoners at the same scale because the german soldiers would have had a problem with it in contrast to the rest of the war. To be clear, my assertion is that because of the specific enviornment of the war, and the specific brutality of the war being largely ungoverned by the "rules of war" it created an envionment where the soldiery were accepting of the orders given to them to do things like kill prisoners, jehovah's witnesses, jews, gypsies, etc. If the enviornment were different more would have questioned the orders.

Do you disagree with that assessment, or were the Germans just preconditioned to be okay with that type of execution in your opinion?

And by the way, I wasn't saying you sound like my niece to be a jerk. You literally sound like my niece when she has a small piece of information about something but has no understanding of the history of it. You don't have to feel any kind of way. Relax. I love my niece. And I love you.

 

[dennis roadman]

Well now. Thats a rather long and condescending way of saying I am right.

They were not rioting to gain power as you indicated. They had the power defacto by having the numbers.
And no one in the know believes the treaty of versalles is a hidden nugget. I only remind you of it because you proposed that hitler dragged germany into the war. The very same war that anyone aware of that treaty could have told you was coming before the ink was dry.

I only assumed you were not aware of it because to know about it and still pretend Hitler dragged germany into war... well, that would take you from naive to something more sinister.

But since you seem to have a grasp of treaties, let me ask you this. I would say that most of the attrocities that Hitler is known for basically boil down to the dispute between Russia/Germany over their respective stances on the Hague Convention treaties. Had both been signatories to all items WW2 would have been much smoother and all the war crime stuff would be out the window. I don't think they could have rolled out executing prisoners at the same scale because the german soldiers would have had a problem with it in contrast to the rest of the war. To be clear, my assertion is that because of the specific enviornment of the war, and the specific brutality of the war being largely ungoverned by the "rules of war" it created an envionment where the soldiery were accepting of the orders given to them to do things like kill prisoners, jehovah's witnesses, jews, gypsies, etc. If the enviornment were different more would have questioned the orders.

Do you disagree with that assessment, or were the Germans just preconditioned to be okay with that type of execution in your opinion?

And by the way, I wasn't saying you sound like my niece to be a jerk. You literally sound like my niece when she has a small piece of information about something but has no understanding of the history of it. You don't have to feel any kind of way. Relax. I love my niece. And I love you.

right in the sense that you're not actually disagreeing with me, save for one aspect: hitler ended up spending more money to mobilize the german military than the reparations they were charged with at versailles. so "dragged into war" isn't so inaccurate. it wasn't coincidence that an embittered teutonic nationalist who fought in the most strongly manifested nationalist war of the modern world (what was nationalism before the famous "guns of august"?) pushed for expansion of borders of an equally embittered people. since so many in this thread seem desperate to acknowledge hitler as some misunderstood genius (not saying you specifically), i'll concede that he was clever enough to exploit versailles to get what he wanted. but let's be clear - that's what HE wanted, his hand was NOT forced. this isn't something i made up - this is one of the central debates of Weimar scholarship

as for your assertion, it's interesting. i think the brutality of it was a direct result of so many of the belligerents being blatantly brought to war by ideological groups - that's really what weakens the "i was just following orders" defense. it wasn't just presidents and dictators dispatching soldiers, it was political parties seizing power and seeking to carve out even more influence in their environs through war.

another thing is that rules of war have almost never applied on the ground, and this was the first war in a long time where desperation set it, wrought by the first episode a few decades earlier, and the first one in history where brehs stopped galloping on horses and starting busting choppers at one another.

and i appreciate your amorous sentiment, but saying i have no understanding of the history behind it is bullshyt tbh, and you're the one who introduced the word "condescending" here

 

[Truth200]

 

[aboss4real24]

ppl n the south are just dum

 

[Truth200]

this dude @Truth200 was in that Travis Scott x Mike Brown interview thread defending his avi being a Nordic Skull..saying it's a skateboard logo.

I think if you read thru this thread you would see that my post are not the ones you should have been worried about.....