We aren't talking about the same thing and I'm being serious.That’s not what we’re saying. We’re saying he should get time off AFTER being robbed.
And, you’re talking about the same robber but ANYONE can attempt robbery. And truth be told, it is practice in some circles for some thieves to steal a mark’s information so they can double back and rob them again.
So maybe ALL that plays a factor in why he doesn’t need to be in there the day after, working with customers.
So, yes we understand you’re trying to be funny but, no, you’re wrong.
Im asking seriously what the point of having paid time off would do.
If he comes back two weeks later than 3 days back on the job, he gets robbed again, does he get another 2 weeks paid? Where does the cycle end? Most businesses operate at minimum staffing as it is, even before covid. If you know any person that's worked at a restaurant, store, you always hear "i had to stay because xxxx didn't show up" "xxxx had to leave early so i had to stay".
If someone comes into Burger king and waves a gun and forces the cashier, drive thru worker and the 2 cooks in the back into a backroom at gun point while they run the registers, you think the entire restaurant should just close for a few days? Or do you think "well that was the evening)night crew the other workers can still work breakfast and days, they can just close early......"
It financially doesn't make sense. You realize if the store closes or cuts hours, then they lose business. At that point you might as well say if an employee gets robbed that the business owners pays them out and hires someone new.



if you think you can run a financially stable business while closing up shop and paying people for not working, i support it, ill donate, ill come through and buy.