Americans die younger in states run by conservatives, study finds

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,491
Reputation
10,652
Daps
187,866



More liberal policies on environment, gun safety, labor, economic taxes and tobacco taxes associated with lower mortality

4794.jpg

American life expectancy as a whole is lower than in most high-income countries, ‘fall[ing] between … Cuba and Albania’. Photograph: Jeremy Woodhouse/Getty Images

Martin Pengelly in New York
@MartinPengelly
Thu 27 Oct 2022 07.50 EDT




Americans die younger in conservative states than in those governed by liberals, a new study has found.

The authors wrote: “Simulations indicate that changing all policy domains in all states to a fully liberal orientation might have saved 171,030 lives in 2019, while changing them to a fully conservative orientation might have cost 217,635 lives.”

The study was published on Plos One, “an inclusive journal community working together to advance science for the benefit of society, now and in the future”.

The authors are from Syracuse University in New York, Harvard in Massachusetts, Virginia Commonwealth University, the University of Washington, the University of Texas at Austin and the University of Western Ontario, in Canada.

They wrote: “Results show that the policy domains were associated with working-age mortality.”

Bucking the trend, the study found that “more conservative marijuana policies” were associated with lower mortality rates.

But it also found that “more liberal policies on the environment, gun safety, labour, economic taxes and tobacco taxes in a state were associated with lower mortality in that state”.

They added: “Especially strong associations were observed between certain domains and specific causes of death: between the gun safety domain and suicide mortality among men, between the labour domain and alcohol-induced mortality, and between both the economic tax and tobacco tax domains and CVD [cardiovascular] mortality.”

According to the National Council of State Legislatures, as of June this year Republicans controlled 61% of state legislatures and Democrats 35%. In terms of whole state governments, Republicans controlled 46% and Democrats 12%, with 12 states divided.

The study authors also noted that American life expectancy as a whole is lower than in most high-income countries, “fall[ing] between … Cuba and Albania”.

They wrote: “The rise in working-age mortality rates in the US in recent decades largely reflects stalled declines in cardiovascular disease mortality alongside rising mortality from alcohol-induced causes, suicide and drug poisoning; and it has been especially severe in some US states. Building on recent work, this study examined whether US state policy contexts may be a central explanation.”

With federal and state midterm elections less than two weeks away, increased social spending in legislation passed by Democrats in Congress and the Biden administration has become a key issue in voters’ minds.

Joe Biden and other senior Democrats have sought to emphasise the success and necessity of such measures. But Republicans, who have presented such measures as irresponsible and contributing to inflation, are poised to retake the House and perhaps the Senate.

The study authors wrote: “One study found that US life expectancy could increase by nearly four years if the country matched the average level of social policy generosity offered in 17 other high-income countries.

“More recent research has turned attention to policies and politics at the US state level, given the federalist structure of the US political system and the large size and geographical spread of the population. This new work suggests that changes in state policies and politics may have played a contributory role in producing the troubling US mortality trends.”
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,491
Reputation
10,652
Daps
187,866
The study authors wrote: “One study found that US life expectancy could increase by nearly four years if the country matched the average level of social policy generosity offered in 17 other high-income countries.

from the study

1.2. Lifestyle and health care explanations​

The US now has one of the lowest smoking rates of high-income countries; of comparable countries, only Sweden has lower rates. However, historically it was the highest tobacco consumer and there is evidence that around 20% of the US health disadvantage in terms of life expectancy and mortality of the over 50s is attributable to these historical differences in smoking rates (Preston et al., 2010).

those damn liberal policies such as smoke-free restaurants/bars, workplaces and anti-smoking campaigns.
 

Bar Razor

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,560
Reputation
1,415
Daps
12,949
Of course. They're also the poorest, least educated, etc. Take a look at Kansas if you want to see the ultimate conservative vision for the US. How people get suckered by conservative rhetoric - "family values", fiscal responsibility blah blah blah when it's obvious what the outcomes they stand for are is truly a testament to the power of propaganda.
 

bnew

Veteran
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
69,491
Reputation
10,652
Daps
187,866
Of course. They're also the poorest, least educated, etc. Take a look at Kansas if you want to see the ultimate conservative vision for the US. How people get suckered by conservative rhetoric - "family values", fiscal responsibility blah blah blah when it's obvious what the outcomes they stand for are is truly a testament to the power of propaganda.

yup, the kansas experiment was a massive L.

Kansas experiment - Wikipedia

The Kansas experiment refers to Kansas Senate Bill Substitute HB 2117, a bill signed into law in May 2012 by Sam Brownback, governor of the state of Kansas.[1] It was one of the largest income tax cuts in the state's history,[2] which Brownback believed would be a "shot of adrenaline into the heart of the Kansas economy".[3]

The cuts were based on model legislation published by the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC),[4][5][6][7] supported by supply-side economist Arthur Laffer,[8] and anti-tax leader Grover Norquist.[9] The law cut taxes by US$231 million in its first year, and cuts were projected to total US$934 million after six years,[10] by eliminating taxes on business income for the owners of almost 200,000 businesses and cutting individual income tax rates.[10] Brownback compared his tax policies with those of Ronald Reagan, but also described them as "a real live experiment",[11] and had predicted that by 2020 they would have created an additional 23,000 jobs.[2]

However, by 2017 state revenues had fallen by hundreds of millions of dollars,[12] causing spending on roads, bridges, and education to be slashed.[13][14] With economic growth remaining consistently below average,[15] the Republican Legislature of Kansas voted to roll back the cuts; although Brownback vetoed the repeal, the legislature succeeded in overriding his veto.[16]

The Kansas experiment[17] has also been called the "Great Kansas Tax Cut Experiment,"[15] the "Red-state experiment,"[18] "the tax experiment in Kansas,"[19] and "one of the cleanest experiments for how tax cuts affect economic growth in the U.S."[20]
 
Top