the NYT did that shyt too
Lol, that is nowhere near as disrespectful (or disrespectful at all, for that matter).
the NYT did that shyt too
It implies certain thingsNothing wrong with the Tweet, it's a accurate description, a drunk girl(nothing wrong with that) showed up on his porch and he killed her in cold blood.
They could have been more tasteful yea and said her name but I don't think it would have gotten as much attention
There is nothing wrong with this headline. If anything, it makes him look worse
fox2 detroit Facebook pageDude got convicted?!?!
I know cacs on message boards all across the world wide web are fuming right now
Somebody point me in the direction of a good bathing spot for cac tears.![]()
She was 19, drinking and driving.
Yep. But not with a shotgun. I hate people who drink and drive. People who do drugs and drive. Pretty much anyone who thinks its a thrill to impair their senses and up the ante by trying to harm others.So she definitely deserved to die right!![]()
Reminds me of Katrina when blacks were "looting" food in New Orleans, while white folks "found" it
![]()
Reminds me of Katrina when blacks were "looting" food in New Orleans, while white folks "found" it
![]()
The way I see it this is quite different from the Katrina situation
I can see why the mentioning of her drunken state does slightly lean sympathy towards the killer but I feel the newspaper is within their rights to print the plain face facts without being called racist.
Calling looting "finding" is not printing the plain face facts, especially when you are willing to call it looting when the perpetrator is a black person (and not to mention that in the context of katrina, a local disaster, people should not be expected to give up their right to survival over manufactured rules of civility; THAT news outfit deserved every bit of derision they got, not this one here.