Are beauty standards lower for women or men ?

[Mike809]

And I ain’t talking about celebrities, but just common people .

I think it’s lower for women , at least on social media . We seen many women who would be considered medically obese , be seen as dime with thousands of followers . Now the equivalent of that for the average non famous dude , would be 6.2 and above tall , body fat of less than 8 , etc .

edit: I ain't talkiing about just sex-wise , but even women be hyping up average looking women , even if they know deep down that they aint that pretty.
Society is harsher on average looking guys , than average looking women.

 

[$cam-U-Well_Jack$on]

Can’t get no lower than this one star.

 

[CP3.]

Women because there's just too many desperate and horny men.

 

[Treblemaka]

Depends on how you frame it.

If were talking about for fuking women clearly have a lower standard. Men will fuk some of anything. A grenade can fukk a strange faster than an non-famous Aaron Pierre can.

If were talking about relationships clearly men dont have to aspire to much. How many women could keep a man if she was fat, ugly, and annoying? There are men that are all of those things and can keep a wife no problem if he pays the bills.

 

[Plankton]

The nastiest looking, burnt out, bummy and smelling female crackhead in the hood will still be able to get dikk. So the answer is women.

 

[feelosofer]

Women's beauty standards are def lower. I have seen some solid dudes wife avg below average women at least purely from a looks standpoint.

 

[CopiousX]

And I ain’t talking about celebrities, but just common people .

I think it’s lower for women , at least on social media . We seen many women who would be considered medically obese , be seen as dime with thousands of followers . Now the equivalent of that for the average non famous dude , would be 6.2 and above tall , body fat of less than 8 , etc .

Men without a shadow of a doubt.

We basically just wake up, take a shower, maybe shave, and we are good to go. Outside of the metrosexual dudes in the coast cities (Miami, NYC, LA) that's the limit to male upkeep .



Compare this to even fat or ugly women that have hour long prep before going out into the world. All sorts of skin treatments, hair treatments, special soaps, special makeup, etc. They also spend a lot of time deliberating what they wear and how they wear it. Whereas most guys have a limited rotation of clothing they pick on a whim

 

[Matt504]

attention doesn't equal beauty. In the coming weeks we'll see brothers on here lusting after AI models and it's because men will reward anything that can be sexualized with attention. Beauty standards will always be higher for women in this society, men can be bankrupt in the looks dept and make up for it with money and resources.

 

[Cryptocurrency Scarface]

Used to be men once dating apps showed up it became women

 

[Lucky_Lefty]

Have you ever seen a fat dude talk about all these broads trying to fukk? I think not. Fat broads let three nikkas fukk and they think they’re prime Iman

 

[O.T.I.S.]

You could just remove “beauty” from the title and just leave standards.

 

[Unbothered]

I'd say women simply because the truth of the matter is that generally speaking, most men will fuk any woman who's willing to give him the rhythm, it doesn't matter if she's fat, funky, ugly, etc. Most dudes aren't turning down sex because the opportunity isn't always available due to numerous reasons that put some guys at a disadvantage, so they have to take what they can get, sexually, and romantically speaking.

Men on the other hand, I'd say the standard is a bit higher for us. Women aren't as thirsty, they're not gonna have sex with any man just because he's got a jewel down below the belt. A woman ain't giving up her body to some fat funky man just because he's gotta dikk (pause). From her perspective, he has to be attractive, more than likely fit/in shape, among other physical traits women generally find desirable in a man.

 

[KidJSoul]

It's a matter of perspective

An ugly woman will have an easier time getting casual hookups than an ugly man. Also easier time getting ATTRACTIVE hookups.


But for a relationship, men can "make up" for appearance. If they have money or enough charm they can get an attractive woman to commit more than an ugly woman can.

But also at the same time, what's considered "beautiful" or attractive for women has a lower bar than for men. In 2025, As a woman, all you gotta do is not be ugly and you're considered somewhat attractive

As where for men, the bar is higher- it you arent very attractive, you are basically unremarkable

 

[IsThatBrothaMouzone?]

Women will say that men can use money/fame/power to overcome below average looks.

That's partially true.

HOWEVER....women aren't going to truly lust after an ugly rich man. They'll tolerate him and maybe love him, but it won't be cheap.

Men OTOH, will lust after a MUCH wider variety of women.

Lemme know when a man gets a bunch of women lusting after him despite being single, under 5'9", average face, chubby, not rich and average .....many women will happily marry that guy, but they're not offering with zero commitment to that guy.

Women can get sexxed up by most men, so they don't value casual hookups unless the guy meets a certain standard. Only really attractive men can get it just by existing.

 

[maxamusa]

"Beauty standards" for men

Hold this neg you bi-sexual fakkit