I'm assuming that's Toronto. To my understanding it's also similar in the uk.Wait, I didn’t know Somalis had beef with Jamaicans/Caribbeans!?!
Everybody in the Universe looks at people from West Africa the exact same way.Been telling yall for years how Somalis and Ethiopian view black people of western African descent.
I hate that phrase. Most of Africa is below the Sahara. It's coded to mean black Africa.
Always look for the operative buzzwords in posts like this
“SUB-Saharan”
The ugliest slick shyt ever if you know you know. Look behind the words. Places you lower through the use of language. Do you really think they use sub Saharan strictly to denote someone being below the Sahara? No it’s always some slick shyt. Like a politically correct way of saying Subhuman.
The term sub Sahara is odd to me..... like it was some type of impenetrable force field that kept darker Africans away from the rest of the world lol. Black Africans travel just like any other group.
These two posts are pure truth. Respect @Warren Peace for exposing the sinister motives of these racist cacs.
When cacs are talking about « Sub-saharan Africans » that’s what they really want to say.
I hate that phrase. Most of Africa is below the Sahara. It's coded to mean black Africa.
it's semantics. it's meant to place people "lower" in the minds of the general public. if it doesn't make sense geographically speaking that's because it's hardly geographic. like some slick shyt. you notice they use it like a slur whenever we try to claim that we existed outside of that area, and god forbid, the continent.
"the egyptians are something to marvel at, but you come from SUB SAHARAN stock"
SUBhuman, SUBpar, SUBservient, etc... like why even come up with a term based on such an arbituary marker? probably because there was a different purpose entirely.