Atheist explain this...... /Debunking Atheistism with facts and science.

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

except it's not.

The definition of God:
1. (in Christianity and other monotheistic religions) the creator and ruler of the universe and source of all moral authority; the supreme being.
2. (In certain other religions) a superhuman being or spirit worshiped as having power over nature or human fortunes; a deity.

If you guys want to worship nature or ambiguous energy then just say that. But that's not what these religions are saying God is.

When people claim that God is nature/energy/whatever and since we have evidence of nature/energy/whatever then that proves that God exists, they are just applying labels to things they can rationally believe in because they are afraid to say that they don't believe in God.

the concept is still ambiguous because you can't prove it according to christian and other religious definitions. it's direct, but not measurable, therefore not scientific. i'm saying if he created everything and has control over it, then any expression he makes, he makes thru the universe. the sum total of all things. if you didn't credit God the way i'm crediting him, you wouldn't have much of a rational point to stand on...

 

[dj-method-x]

the concept is still ambiguous because you can't prove it according to christian and other religious definitions. it's direct, but not measurable, therefore not scientific. i'm saying if he created everything and has control over it, then any expression he makes, he makes thru the universe. the sum total of all things. if you didn't credit God the way i'm crediting him, you wouldn't have much of a rational point to stand on...

If you want to say that everything is God, then of course your concept of God exists, since it's impossible to argue that the sum of everything doesn't exist. You have effectively moved the goal posts far enough where it's impossible to be an atheist.

But the concept of God paraded by most religious folk is attached with so much more than that. The sum of everything makes sense. But making the supernatural conclusions that most religions add on to this concept is what atheist don't believe in.

 

[Everythingg]

Dimensions refer to spatial dimensions, we're not talking about the sci-fi concept of alternative dimensions (which would be alternative universes) but rather that in addition to height, width, and depth there might be something else called ular or iqos that affect the smallest bits of matter but won't affect stuff our size.

Say God exist.
Now what?

Do we stop verifying experimental results?
Do we stop peer-reviewing the work of other researchers?
Does it actually change any of the theories we have?

Nope, nope, and nope.
The existence, or non-existence, of God isn't relevant because our understanding of the universe doesn't need a supernatural beings. You don't need a God to make rain fall, or to cause chemical reactions, or to test new medicines, or to invent even smaller circuits, and so on.

You got much to learn breh (as we all do). Do you think that those in power are paying scientists BILLIONS of dollars to work for the benefit of mankind or themselves? Simple question. As well, where did all those Nazi scientists go to again after WW2? They arent trying to find new measurements to measure. They're trying to find ways to open portals to other dimensions.

What good is the experiments your god/idol science does when they do nothing about the oppression this world is under? What good is knowing the distance the sun is from the moon if it doesnt stop people from actively causing starvation? What good is knowing the universe is always expanding if it doesnt stop those in power from creating wars and sending the regular folk to fight them? Nothing right? So yea, "Gods" existence is relevant in all this. Because since He exists (not if), it would be wise for the world, as His creation, to see if we are living in the ways He wants us to, if it even matters (we're not and it does). The audacity of you to say that knowing about the Creator of the universe adding NOTHING to our understanding of the universe shows the pride that humanity is filled with. That same pride that will be most of yalls downfall. You wont hear me though. If God says that He will destroy the world and humanity if they behave in certain ways, then that is CERTAINLY relevant. And that is something we CERTAINLY need to understand once coming into contact with Him. The thing is you and other atheists, allowed the elite (who certainly believe in spirits) to trick yall into believing that we're here by ourselves lol

You erase "God" from the equation, then theres no rain, no chemical reactions, no circuits, no you. So yes, He's very relevant. And once He decides to take His ball home (that is, take back whats His) then all of you who oppose Him go bye bye. Should have been seeking the truth and not the opinions of government sponsored scientists lol

 

[Everythingg]

But the concept of God paraded by most religious folk is attached with so much more than that. The sum of everything makes sense. But making the supernatural conclusions that most religions add on to this concept is what atheist don't believe in.

No it doesnt make sense lol

To think that humanity, the humanity that can come together, build great building, communities, cities, states, countries; humanity can eat shyt, speak, walk, talk, laugh, cry, etc... came from SOMETHING that can do NONE of these things, is illogical. No matter how you slice it. So it simply being "the sum of all things" but having no life, is still illogical. Because now we're saying that we have greater capabilities in some aspects than our creator (the universe in your eyes I assume)...

Again, that makes NO sense and the existence of a Creator WITH LIFE makes way more sense. Again, no matter how you slice it.

 

[Dominicansbelit]

smh... if u believe in god in 2015 hold this L

 

[Everythingg]

You'll be holding the L after they enact martial law....