Damn sometimes I wish that site wasn't created. I know that's where all you dumbasses are getting your Kobe/Lebron thread ideas from. 
Basketball-Reference.com being misused for stanning purposes Unappreciation Thread
- Thread starter dtownreppin214
- Start date
My Girl is Bow Legged
JUST DO IT LIKE
I thought that was what it was created for
That and to make "analysts" look like they know what they're talking about
That and to make "analysts" look like they know what they're talking about
NBA Elo Player Ratings | Basketball-Reference.com
Current Top Five (All-Time):
1. Larry Bird (2209)
2. Michael Jordan (2199)
3. Hakeem Olajuwon (2185)
4. LeBron James (2137)
5. Bill Russell (2117)
Current Top Five (Active):
1. LeBron James (2137)
2. Tim Duncan (2103)
3. Kevin Garnett (2055)
4. Kevin Durant (2045)
5. Chris Paul (2006)
Current Top Five (All-Time):
1. Larry Bird (2209)
2. Michael Jordan (2199)
3. Hakeem Olajuwon (2185)
4. LeBron James (2137)
5. Bill Russell (2117)
Current Top Five (Active):
1. LeBron James (2137)
2. Tim Duncan (2103)
3. Kevin Garnett (2055)
4. Kevin Durant (2045)
5. Chris Paul (2006)
NBA Elo Player Ratings | Basketball-Reference.com
Current Top Five (All-Time):
1. Larry Bird (2209)
2. Michael Jordan (2199)
3. Hakeem Olajuwon (2185)
4. LeBron James (2137)
5. Bill Russell (2117)
Current Top Five (Active):
1. LeBron James (2137)
2. Tim Duncan (2103)
3. Kevin Garnett (2055)
4. Kevin Durant (2045)
5. Chris Paul (2006)
I'm startin' to wonder if Nowitzki'll ever get his proper due, and get put ahead of The Big Ticket
I'm startin' to wonder if Nowitzki'll ever get his proper due, and get put ahead of The Big Ticket
Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, and Allen Iverson ahead of Dirk on that list
Pau Gasol is ahead of Kobe 
Ready2Rhyme
Young, Gifted, and Black
At the same time a lot of bullsh** gets corrected with that site as a tool. It's just the stans and their homo agendas that corrupt it.
yseJ
Empire strikes back
its a statistics tool that everyone gets access too, not just some espn clowns who pay stats, inc.
invaluable tool in all sports, too.
who uses it and for what purpose doesnt really mean anything; the site wasnt meant to be used for anything; its an encyclopedia- it just is and you make conclusion yourself.
invaluable tool in all sports, too.
who uses it and for what purpose doesnt really mean anything; the site wasnt meant to be used for anything; its an encyclopedia- it just is and you make conclusion yourself.
its not being misused. when stanning gets involved, arguments change depending on what they are trying to accomplish. the same people that point to certain stats in one argument ignore those same stats if they dont fall in line with their agenda in another argument. thats the misuse, it has nothing to do with any one website