hmmDidn't he admit he used steroids?
Calvin Smith tested positive out of that 1988 100m final.
Let it go, it's been 30 years already and he failed another 2 tests after that anyway. He was given chances and he continued to phuck up. How do you fail a test, knowing that you'll be tested regardless because you failed 2 previous tests, when you're the only person running
Unless Ben Johnson is your dad, just take solace that Donovan Bailey won you gold 8 years later anyway.
This
Everybody but theCalvin Smith tested positive out of that 1988 100m final.
yesDidn't he admit he used steroids?

Why should we ? A mans life was destroyed because Carl Lewis and USTA were jealous of him.
For the record Carl Lewis should have been disqualified from being on the 1988 team with all the failed tests he had leading up that were covered up the US track team....
This old battered wives syndrome. He continued to take drugs and fail piss tests, not once but twice in the 90's. The second time was even worse, because he wasn't allowed to race against anyone but himself.
I know Carl Lewis and Linford Christie should of both been DQ'd, but werent and Roy Jones should of won gold in 88 as well, but unless you got a time machine, shyt isn't changing, let it go. Majority of the medals won in the 80's track and field were due to drugs, why ain't you pissing and moaning about the female athletes who had to race against the bearded ladies of Eastern Europe?
Canada got it's gold medal in 96 and WR in the end for the 100. Mark McCoy won you gold in 92, I'm sure that more than makes up for being "robbed" in 88.
You talking about a bunch of extra irrelevant shyt in this response thats got nothing to do with the point,that is Carl Lewis should not be celebrated or paraded as the gold medalist of that race like he is as part of his legacy....IF they all cheated why does one guy get stripped and the other known cheater get the accolades...Carl Lewis is treated like a hero when in fact hes a cheating lying scumbag uncle tom fakkit..
