Better PG/PF combo: JKidd & KMart or CP3 & Blake

Who you got?

  • Blake/CP3

    Votes: 58 53.7%
  • JKidd/K-Mart

    Votes: 50 46.3%

  • Total voters
    108

Starski

Superstar
Joined
Feb 12, 2015
Messages
6,243
Reputation
1,301
Daps
18,395
Thats my fav Net duo
i2r40h.png
 
Last edited:

Noah

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2015
Messages
1,970
Reputation
980
Daps
8,137
Offensively this belongs to Blake/CP3. Anchored one of the best offenses last year and they've been spectacular ever since Blake focused on his mid-range shooting and passing. They're just better all-around.

Defensively I like K-Mart way more than Blake as a post defender, dude was lowkey a beast on that end and made it hard for the top tier guys to score. Kidd and Paul are pretty close defensively though. Paul has arguably been the best defensive PG in the league for a while now while Kidd helped anchor a great Nets defense among a defensive-minded era. K-Mart being better on that end gives Kidd-Martin the advantage defensively.

Closer than people think :leon: props to the Kidd-KMart duo mention; back in the day they were naaaaasty.
 

MJ Truth

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
39,148
Reputation
3,785
Daps
155,637
Because Blake is so much better than Kenyon it's not really a fair comparison. Paul and Kidd are very close; I have Kidd as the best PG since Isiah but I wouldn't argue someone saying Paul is better. But Blake is clear better than KMart individually.

However as a tandem Kidd and Martin CLEARLY had better chemistry. I've never really thought Paul actually helps Blake's game that much while on the other hand Kidd basically MADE Martin an All Star. I mean hell, this is the same guy that got Mikki Moore major money and had people thinking Richard Jefferson was an All Star.
 

meth68

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Aug 13, 2014
Messages
4,331
Reputation
1,385
Daps
12,837
Reppin
NJ
Smh... why our bball knowledge only seems to go back 8-10years?
wvnalx8qfufk0x2zg38l.jpg



> Kemp/Glove :mjlol:
> Kmart/Kidd :mjlol::mjlol:
> CP3/Blake :mjlol:
 

Gil Scott-Heroin

Veteran
Bushed
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
89,679
Reputation
10,241
Daps
241,471
Because Blake is so much better than Kenyon it's not really a fair comparison. Paul and Kidd are very close; I have Kidd as the best PG since Isiah but I wouldn't argue someone saying Paul is better. But Blake is clear better than KMart individually.

However as a tandem Kidd and Martin CLEARLY had better chemistry. I've never really thought Paul actually helps Blake's game that much while on the other hand Kidd basically MADE Martin an All Star. I mean hell, this is the same guy that got Mikki Moore major money and had people thinking Richard Jefferson was an All Star.
Better chemistry in terms of viewing/entertainment or results? :jbhmm:
 
Top