In a second case, one involving racial discrimination, Jackson-Akiwumi authored a decision that gave an African-American couple, the only people of color in their Indiana community, the opportunity to prove their claim of racial discrimination in the context of housing to a jury. The couple, the Watters, had sued the Homeowners’ Association and several of its members for race discrimination and failure to accommodate Terence Watters’s post-traumatic stress disorder under the Fair Housing Act and 42 U.S.C.§ 1982. The evidence in the case revealed significant harassment against Tonca and Terence Watters, including the president of the homeowners’ association directing racist slurs at the couple. Yet the lower court had granted summary judgment in favor of all defendants on all counts. The Seventh Circuit vacated that judgment, ensuring the couple would be able to bring their case before a jury. Judge Amy St. Eve, appointed by President Trump, dissented and would have upheld the dismissal of the Watters’ complaint.
jackson akiwumi is one of the judges listed in this thread and she has had plenty of rulings like this.
Then of course there's kentaji brown, do I need to post her opinions in the affirmative action and student relief cases in contrast to the trump appointed justices as well?
Those people were vetted by the establishment to do their bidding. Them having black faces means nothing. They are not beholden to do anything for black people.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.