Biden signs Hard on China business order

goatmane

Veteran
Joined
Jan 26, 2017
Messages
16,928
Reputation
2,731
Daps
115,758
BIDEN'S ASIA POLICY
US and allies to build 'China-free' tech supply chain
US and allies to build 'China-free' tech supply chain


Exclusive: Biden to sign presidential order to bolster chip, battery and rare-earth industries

https%3A%2F%2Fs3-ap-northeast-1.amazonaws.com%2Fpsh-ex-ftnikkei-3937bb4%2Fimages%2F8%2F9%2F4%2F3%2F32603498-4-eng-GB%2FCropped-1614101155photo.JPG

The issue of tech supply chains has taken on added urgency with a chip shortage this year that has hit automakers particularly hard. © Reuters
TAISEI HOYAMA and YU NAKAMURA, Nikkei staff writersFebruary 24, 2021 02:00 JSTUpdated on February 24, 2021 03:58 JST
WASHINGTON/TAIPEI -- U.S. President Joe Biden is set to sign an executive order as early as this month to accelerate efforts to build supply chains for chips and other strategically significant products that are less reliant on China, in partnership with the likes of Taiwan, Japan and South Korea.

The document will order the development of a national supply chain strategy, and is expected to call for recommendations for supply networks that are less vulnerable to disruptions such as disasters and sanctions by unfriendly countries. Measures will focus on semiconductors, electric-vehicle batteries, rare-earth metals and medical products, according to a draft obtained by Nikkei.

The order states that "working with allies can lead to strong, resilient supply chains," suggesting that international relationships will be central to this plan. Washington is expected to pursue partnerships with Taiwan, Japan and South Korea in chip production and Asia-Pacific economies including Australia in rare earths.

The U.S. plans to share information with allies on supply networks for important products and will look to leverage complementary production. It will consider a framework for speedy sharing of these items in emergencies, as well as discuss securing stockpiles and spare manufacturing capacity. Partners could be asked to do less business with China.

The issue has taken on added urgency with a chip shortage this year that has hit automakers particularly hard.

The U.S. has seen its share of global semiconductor manufacturing capacity plummet in recent decades, according to Boston Consulting Group. What was 37% in 1990 is now down to 12%.

While it has asked Taiwan -- which tops the list at 22% -- to ramp up output, plants there are already operating at full blast, and there are few options for boosting supply in the short term.

Meanwhile, Boston Consulting forecasts that China, helped by an estimated $100 billion in government subsidies, will lead the world with a 24% share in 2030.

Depending too heavily on China for important products poses security risks. Beijing has used regulations to put pressure on trading partners, such as imposing an embargo on rare-earth exports to Japan in 2010 amid tensions over the Japanese-administered Senkaku Islands, which China claims as the Diaoyu.

The U.S. imports about 80% of its rare earths from China, and relies on the country for as much as 90% of some medical products.

Restructuring supply chains is likely to take quite some time, particularly in semiconductors. Because the number of top chipmakers in the world is limited, these companies have the leverage to decide whether to follow America's lead. Doing so will require understanding and cooperation from other governments.

"I've heard that for now, the U.S. will do an intensive review of its supply chains to sort out how much it depends on which countries for semiconductors and rare earths," a Japanese government source said. "It will hash out countermeasures with allies after that."

Washington has already begun laying the groundwork, calling since last fall for economies that are rich in valuable technology or resources, such as Taiwan, Japan and Australia, to join it in disentangling supply chains from China amid simmering tensions with Beijing.

Taipei has been especially quick to respond. Senior U.S. and Taiwanese officials signed a memorandum of understanding in November to promote technological cooperation in seven areas, including semiconductors and fifth-generation wireless, as well as "safe, secure and reliable supply chains."

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., the world's top chip foundry, agreed last spring to build a fabrication facility in Arizona that is likely to become a symbol of this bilateral relationship. The chipmaker will invest $12 billion in the plant, which will produce semiconductors for the military and is slated to come online in 2024. The U.S. government is providing subsidies for the project.

Japan's Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has since last year been leading an effort to attract TSMC to the country, to not only establish a more solid three-way supply network, but also provide Japan with a secure future source of cutting-edge chips. The government has budgeted 200 billion yen ($1.9 billion) to roll out the red carpet for the foundry, with an eye toward possible cooperation with Japanese companies.

This appears to be bearing fruit. Nikkei learned this month that TSMC is making plans to build a 20 billion yen research and development center in Japan.

In rare earths, the U.S. is teaming with Australia to work around China's dominance. Australian rare-earth miner Lynas is building a processing facility in Texas with financial support from the U.S. Department of Defense.

Electric-vehicle batteries are another area where action is needed, as Panasonic and South Korea's LG Chem lose market share to Chinese rivals.

But in other fields, such as 5G, new supply chains may prove expensive for American and Japanese companies that lose access to cost-competitive Chinese suppliers like Huawei Technologies.
 

DoomzdayzV

Banned
Joined
May 28, 2012
Messages
7,077
Reputation
-974
Daps
18,340
Reppin
NULL
not enough.....we need a war with China. At the very least we need to make it impossible for their citizens to acquire residency or visas over here.
 

Dr. Acula

Hail Hydra
Supporter
Joined
Jul 26, 2012
Messages
26,357
Reputation
8,971
Daps
140,501
Obama was harder on China than Trump who had several business relationships with the Chinese.

But, you see, folks just pay attention to rhetoric. TPP despite all its faults was a direct challenge to China and would have been more effective than the brutish way Trump went about applying tarrifs that ended up backfiring on our farmers. But unlike Trump, Obama and now Joe Biden, didn't spend a lot of time just yapping but instead doing shyt.

Once Trump removed the TPP, China came in with new agreements with all the countries that were part of it and filled the void. TPP excluded China as an isolation measure.

I trust Biden to be harder on China than Trump.

1523190075129.png

Chess, not checkers like the last guy.
 

Ya' Cousin Cleon

OG COUCH CORNER HUSTLA
Joined
Jun 21, 2014
Messages
24,285
Reputation
-1,545
Daps
82,051
Reppin
Harvey World to Dallas, TX
China didn’t Westernise; the West became more Chinese

Like a pistol shot in 1914 Sarajevo, Covid can be seen as a chance event ushering in the end of a tottering old world and the beginning of a new one. A historical accelerant speeding along changes that were, perhaps, always inevitable. The West’s lacklustre handling of Covid compared to China’s top-down authoritarian statism has been a wake-up call to the American establishment; a sobering dry run for the period of “extreme competition” we have now entered. Joe Biden’s note of alarm yesterday, after his two-hour phone call with Xi Jinping, that “if we don’t get moving, they’re going to eat our lunch,” marks a shift of historic proportions.

In his detailed analysis for the New York Times Noam Schreiber notes that Biden’s new Build Back Better industrial policy is “deviation from the free-trade gospel” calling for $400 billion in government procurement of American-made equipment, $300 billion for research and development, and hundreds of billions more in subsidies to promote domestic manufacturing.

As the article notes:


“China is effectively forcing other countries to adopt some of its own industrial policies, because a free market in which only one side plays by the rules isn’t so much a market as a sucker’s game… after decades of free-market orthodoxy in which protectionism became taboo among both parties’ elites, it is the rise of China, above all else, that is bringing nationalistic management of the economy back into the political mainstream.”

- NOAM SCHEIBER, THE NEW YORK TIMES MAGAZINE
We’ve been here before, of course. The world before 1914, as Keynes famously observed, was one of globalisation overseen by British imperial hegemony, the first End of History when the economic and political liberals of the day, like those of our own time, “regarded this state of affairs as normal, certain, and permanent, except in the direction of further improvement, and any deviation from it as aberrant, scandalous, and avoidable.” Yet great power competition brought the first age of globalisation shuddering to a halt, in a catastrophic collision with reality from which Britain and Europe have never recovered.

America’s political and defence establishment is now trying to turn around the great ship of state at breakneck speed to avoid their own empire-sinking collision with reality. As the analyst Matt Stoller notes, the Pentagon has realised with a juddering lurch of anxiety that the neoliberalising trends of the past few decades have simultaneously exposed the American defence industry to fragile and overextended supply chainsoften rooted in China itself— and to a form of monopoly capitalism that leaves the US taxpayer paying over the odds for inferior products.

With even Lockheed Martin’s CEO urging replication of the China model— in Stoller’s words, to “mimic authoritarian societies in the way we run our commerce,” China’s already winning the economic Cold War.

This is surely the great irony, and supreme historical significance of Covid: for decades, America’s establishment, not least Biden himself, earnestly believed that globalisation would move China in a liberal direction. Instead, the wealth, ambition and power of the rival superpower unleashed by globalisation is forcing the West to become more statist just to keep up.


China didn't Westernise; the West became more Chinese - The Post
 

Scustin Bieburr

Baby baybee baybee UUUGH
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
22,802
Reputation
12,596
Daps
132,375
Good. fukk em. Ima keep boycotting. I dont give a F about cost. Id rather buy tech at a higher price if it means I ain't supporting a country that has literal slaves building the shyt and is on some open 1950s jim crow racism shyt.


this nikka biden doin the damn thing. he is on some "i may not even be alive in 4 years fukk it" tip

I'm with it. Hope he goes all out like Johnson or FDR did.
 
Top