Bill Gates: Piketty's Attack on Income Inequality Is Right

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,477
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,777
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
Bill Gates has posted a review Capital in the Twenty-First Century, an acclaimed book by economist Thomas Piketty about how income equality is a necessary result of unchecked capitalism. Gates, one of the most successful capitalists of our time, agrees with Piketty's most important conclusions. That said, he also finds parts of the book to be flawed and incomplete, but says Piketty has started vital debate on these issues. Gates writes, Yes, some level of inequality is built in to capitalism. As Piketty argues, it is inherent to the system. The question is, what level of inequality is acceptable? And when does inequality start doing more harm than good? That’s something we should have a public discussion about, and it’s great that Piketty helped advance that discussion in such a serious way. ... I agree that taxation should shift away from taxing labor. It doesn’t make any sense that labor in the United States is taxed so heavily relative to capital. It will make even less sense in the coming years, as robots and other forms of automation come to perform more and more of the skills that human laborers do today. But rather than move to a progressive tax on capital, as Piketty would like, I think we’d be best off with a progressive tax on consumption.
 

Robbie3000

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
32,590
Reputation
6,510
Daps
145,170
Reppin
NULL
Bill Gates has posted a review Capital in the Twenty-First Century, an acclaimed book by economist Thomas Piketty about how income equality is a necessary result of unchecked capitalism. Gates, one of the most successful capitalists of our time, agrees with Piketty's most important conclusions. That said, he also finds parts of the book to be flawed and incomplete, but says Piketty has started vital debate on these issues. Gates writes, Yes, some level of inequality is built in to capitalism. As Piketty argues, it is inherent to the system. The question is, what level of inequality is acceptable? And when does inequality start doing more harm than good? That’s something we should have a public discussion about, and it’s great that Piketty helped advance that discussion in such a serious way. ... I agree that taxation should shift away from taxing labor. It doesn’t make any sense that labor in the United States is taxed so heavily relative to capital. It will make even less sense in the coming years, as robots and other forms of automation come to perform more and more of the skills that human laborers do today. But rather than move to a progressive tax on capital, as Piketty would like, I think we’d be best off with a progressive tax on consumption.

This guy is a commie.
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,172
Reputation
7,500
Daps
105,732
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
What are the real issues?
Underutilization/training of the labor force in competitive/growing sectors. There are a lot of people who are underemployed and educated in things that arent helping the country's bottom line, and by extension keeping them from gaining good employment.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
786
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Underutilization/training of the labor force in competitive/growing sectors. There are a lot of people who are underemployed and educated in things that arent helping the country's bottom line, and by extension keeping them from gaining good employment.
and WHY do these things exist...
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
786
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
"I think we’d be best off with a progressive tax on consumption."

:obama:
which is exactly why we shouldn't listen to him.
Sorta like floating out a question to your kids on what they would hate most to be grounded from and then grounding them from it...
though you always run the risk of meeting up with this sly mofo
images
 

DEAD7

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2012
Messages
51,477
Reputation
4,659
Daps
89,777
Reppin
Fresno, CA.
which is exactly why we shouldn't listen to him.
Sorta like floating out a question to your kids on what they would hate most to be grounded from and then grounding them from it...
though you always run the risk of meeting up with this sly mofo
images
Moving away from the income tax(altogether) is essentially the same as raising the min wage :sas2: and accompanied by a progressive tax on consumption, and capital gains... should be reasonable to both sides no?
 

TLR Is Mental Poison

The Coli Is Not For You
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
46,172
Reputation
7,500
Daps
105,732
Reppin
The Opposite Of Elliott Wilson's Mohawk
Moving away from the income tax(altogether) is essentially the same as raising the min wage :sas2: and accompanied by a progressive tax on consumption, and capital gains... should be reasonable to both sides no?
Moving to an entirely consumption based tax system is asinine. All it would do is push people to hide transactions. Income is much more difficult to hide. Unless you want the govt to have visibility to all of your financial transactions... that doesnt seem to libertarian :sas1:

Obvious answer to fixing the tax system is to stick with income based tax and just simplify the code/eliminate exceptions/deductions. Aside from the general confusion and exceptionalism there really aren't any problems with our tax system. It's progressive.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
786
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
Its obvious that this is a question with a right/wrong answer, so rather than actually answer I will just ask you why you think our economy is underutilized.
i have theories not answers but ultimately I feel the "reason" becomes circular (chicken/egg) and as a part of that cycle inequality is most definitely playing its role, as are the points you made.

My point is that focusing on one aspect of the cycle while ignoring the others only perpetuates the cycle.
 
Top