mastermind
Rest In Power Kobe
He made two all nba team in Dallas.
Last edited:
Bill Simmons says he'll take Nash ahead of Iverson
- Thread starter viktordoomsecretwars
- Start date
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
He damn sure wasn’t playing with Michael Finley, Dirk, Amare, Marion, Joe Johnson etc
staticshock
Veteran
ayo
AI one of my favorite players ever. But im taking Nash over him all day
AI one of my favorite players ever. But im taking Nash over him all day
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
If Iverson played with the support that Nash had he accomplishes WAY more.Man gis efficiency barely went up those two seasons. Yall make it seem like he went up to 50% or something
AJtheOne
Nets/Giants/Yankees
He had Amare, Iso Joe, Marion, Barbosa etc.
teams were pretty stacked compared to Kobe, LeBron and the other candidates
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
Why do y’all rate him so high
He made an all nba team in Dallas.
Yeah at 27 years old after playing 3 seasons in Dallas and 5 seasons overall. And he was putting up 7 dimes a game. He wasn’t the elite Nash putting up 11 dimes a game until MDA. Nash was not elite his whole career or a superstar. When he was 29/30ish he linked up with MDA and shined. Before that he was a good player who sometimes made the all star team. Allen Iverson was a star
staticshock
Veteran
Why do y’all rate him so high
cause he's one of the best shooters and passers in NBA history
why do yall act like he was Dan dikkau, Jordan Farmer or Steve Blake
Man gis efficiency barely went up those two seasons
he went from shooting 38-42% most years in philly to 45-46% in Denver. 46 is more than good enough for that type of player on that era. That’s not inefficient
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
shyt is fukking weird. If they polled players in that era it’d probably break 90/10 Iverson
Lord_Chief_Rocka
Superstar
I don’t act like that he was a great player. He definitely was NOT as good as Iverson
cause he's one of the best shooters and passers in NBA history
why do yall act like he was Dan dikkau, Jordan Farmer or Steve Blake
who was his competition en route to the NBA Finals. I don't really get why Iverson making the finals is something that reflects solely on his abilities and never the team and the league circumstances at that time.
Nash's early injury struggles were the reason for his slow start. Not ability. If you want to choose Iverson because you think he's more durable, fine. But Nash in his prime has a great case as being a better player than Iverson off the strength of his historically great playmaking and creation efficiency.
People overlook that in Phoenix the medical staff helped to rejuvenate his health. It's not that MDA made him into anything. The situation in general was good for his career.
ManBearPig
half man half bearpig
the 2001 sixers had a 6-5 record without Iverson.
So yeah, Nash on the team would at least reach the playoffs hell, the Sixers went from a sub .500 team to a playoff team taking 2 59-win teams to 6 games after trading Iverson for Ander fukking Milling
there is NO DOUBT that 06 Nash would at least lead that 2006 Sixers to 45 wins.
accomplishes way more in terms of what, championships? with the increased competition in the West?