TransJenner
Banned
Yeezus would've been GOAT with the OG cover and minus that .... Do I say CAC Rick
I hate those peopleI think he wants his music to be exclusive like his shoes...
90% of the regular Black folks over 30 on my Facebook haven't even heard the album yet or even know that it's been released...
The same type of folks that were quoting Drake lines a week after his last album dropped..
He might be a "genius" but not a smart business man.... His shyt still isn't on sale in stores????? What's the point of doing that?
Let's say 100k people signed up to hear tlop, and 30 percent of those people keep paying 20 x month for the next year...
Y'all don't see how this type of residual income could benefit tidal enough for them to purchase the exclusivity form DJ?
It cost $20?
If people don't want to pay for a $10 album, what makes you think they would want to pay $20 per month for a streaming service, when everyone else who isn't paying still gets to see/hear all of the "exclusives". People have no reason to stay with them after they get the "exclusive" they wanted and the free trial is up, unless they have another "exclusive" that the person is interested in near the end of the free trial. But still, people can cancel and use a different card and email to sign up. Or just wait until someone else steals it and sends it to them.
Yeah I'm sure they won't be able to make a profit even though their amount of subscribers just double after the release of tlop. Sounds like you have this more thoroughly thought out than they do
i know this,you know this, tidal knows this.Those are free trial subscribers, they don't count until they pay after the free trial is up. There is always an increase when there is an exclusive lots of people want, and a decrease after the free trial is over.
i know this,you know this, tidal knows.
its a numbers game. There is a percentage of new subscribers out of the million or so that signed up that will cancel. there is a percentage that will stay as subscribers. tidal already has data on the percentage of subscribers they will retain.
this tactic will earn them new subcribers and those residuals will more than pay whatever they paid to get this exclusive. if you think there isnt serious anylitics behind a move like this then i think you dont know how these digital companies move in 2016
maybe not. but right now, there a good chance that they cashed in from this and that this particular initiative will be lucrative.I don't think that would work for long because it will always be the same type of exclusives from the same few people. So the same groups/fans will be joining and canceling.
It costs 10 bucks, I didn't pay for albums, however I've been paying 10 per month for Spotify though.It cost $20?
If people don't want to pay for a $10 album, what makes you think they would want to pay $20 per month for a streaming service, when everyone else who isn't paying still gets to see/hear all of the "exclusives". People have no reason to stay with them after they get the "exclusive" they wanted and the free trial is up, unless they have another "exclusive" that the person is interested in near the end of the free trial. But still, people can cancel and use a different card and email to sign up. Or just wait until someone else steals it and sends it to them.