HarlemHottie
Uptown Thoroughbred
That's already happening, just very...very slowly.
(Smart/Useful) Female influencers can't really penetrate the core audience...they're addicted to the snark/bash/drama culture...like idiot brehs are tuned into sports/political dikkriding.
Normal women are their target.
I suggest they game minds by attacking "male feminists" and "white allies"...to isolate the other core. Reveal female "secrets" and speak on older women raping young boys. Put a lil of that "business" out to make a few folks nervous and humble.
I'm not sure that's necessary and in fact it might be counterproductive. You can't start with negative reinforcement, imo. That comes later.
Understand, this movement didn't start with shytting on black men. It started with hundreds of yrs of advertising the sheer power and strength of the wm. That's a long period of positive reinforcement, ie, 'This man has the means to protect and provide for you,' which is how groups of women make these decisions, ofc, modernity be damned. But, due to the undeniable brutality of white supremacy, our community maintained a strong culture of shaming that behavior (except the example you love to cite, placage, which was a uniquely French accommodation to New World demographics).
What has happened is we've been besieged by a number of very visible, very vocal foreign bw who don't operate under such cultural constraints. And capitalism IS capitalism. It comes down to resources: who has them and who's willing to share them with you. Women, being women, will fill in whatever backstory is necessary to make it make sense. Hence, wm with resources are essentially buying bedwenches, both professionally and personally, and said bedwenches are given platforms to spread the post ad hoc rationale. The only way to fight this is to look like you're the better deal. Given our current wealth positionality, the only path I see is to appear more likely to marry bw than wm/ others.
I'm sure that last sentence got a reaction. You (pl) will see it as simping. Actually, no. Bm already marry bw at 80%+. Problem is, your pr sucks. Black media was one of the few places that highlighted black- black couples. 'New black media' seems to have a love-hate relationship with bw, so it's not functioning in the same way (as pr). If anything, it makes yall look less likely to marry bw than wm/ others.
What has happened is we've been besieged by a number of very visible, very vocal foreign bw who don't operate under such cultural constraints. And capitalism IS capitalism. It comes down to resources: who has them and who's willing to share them with you. Women, being women, will fill in whatever backstory is necessary to make it make sense. Hence, wm with resources are essentially buying bedwenches, both professionally and personally, and said bedwenches are given platforms to spread the post ad hoc rationale. The only way to fight this is to look like you're the better deal. Given our current wealth positionality, the only path I see is to appear more likely to marry bw than wm/ others.
I'm sure that last sentence got a reaction. You (pl) will see it as simping. Actually, no. Bm already marry bw at 80%+. Problem is, your pr sucks. Black media was one of the few places that highlighted black- black couples. 'New black media' seems to have a love-hate relationship with bw, so it's not functioning in the same way (as pr). If anything, it makes yall look less likely to marry bw than wm/ others.

Naming and shaming only comes after you have a core group of bw on our side. That's the task. Negative reinforcement out the gate will not get us there. Women need to see other women doing well to even consider what they say.