Black slave owner, Anthony Johnson helped set the legal precedent for slavery.

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,563
Reputation
3,070
Daps
157,129
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
9167775867_756a4ab83a_z.jpg


In the early 1620s, slave traders captured a man in Portuguese Angola, named him Antonio, and sold him into the Atlantic slave trade. Antonio was bought by a colonist in Virginia. As a slave, Antonio worked for a merchant at the Virginia Company. The following year (1623), "Mary, a Negro" arrived from England aboard the ship Margaret. She was brought to work on the same plantation as Antonio, where she was the only woman. Antonio and Mary married and lived together for more than forty years.


---

Sometime after 1635, Antonio and Mary gained their freedom from indenture. Antonio changed his name to Anthony Johnson. He first entered the legal record as a free man when he purchased a calf in 1647.

Johnson was granted a large plot of farmland by the colonial government after he paid off his indentured contract by his labor. On 24 July 1651, he acquired 250 acres (100 ha) of land under the headright system by buying the contracts of five indentured servants, one of whom was his son Richard Johnson. The headright system worked in such a way that if a man were to bring indentured servants over to America (in this particular case, Johnson brought the five servants), he was owed 50 acres a "head", or servant. The land was located on the Great Naswattock Creek, which flowed into the Pungoteague River in Northampton County, Virginia.. With his own indentured servants, Johnson ran his own tobacco farm. In fact, one of those servants, John Casor, would later become the first African man to be declared indentured for life.

In 1652 "an unfortunate fire" caused "great losses" for the family, and Johnson applied to the courts for tax relief. The court reduced the family's taxes and on 28 February 1652, exempted his wife Mary and their two daughters from paying taxes at all "during their natural lives." At that time taxes were levied on people, not property. Under the 1645 Virginia taxation act, "all negro men and women and all other men from the age of 16 to 60 shall be judged tithable." It is unclear from the records why the Johnson women were exempted, but the change gave them the same social standing as white women, who were not taxed. During the case, the justices noted that Anthony and Mary "have lived Inhabitants in Virginia (above thirty years)" and had been respected for their "hard labor and known service".

By the 1650s, Anthony and Mary Johnson were farming 250 acres in Northampton County while their two sons owned a total of 550 acres.

----

When Anthony Johnson was released from servitude, he was legally recognized as a "free Negro." He became a successful farmer. In 1651 he owned 250 acres (100 ha), and the services of five indentured servants (four white and one black). In 1653, John Casor, a black indentured servant whose contract Johnson appeared to have bought in the early 1640s, approached Captain Goldsmith, claiming his indenture had expired seven years earlier and that he was being held illegally by Johnson. A neighbor, Robert Parker, intervened and persuaded Johnson to free Casor.

Parker offered Casor work, and he signed a term of indenture to the planter. Johnson sued Parker in the Northampton Court in 1654 for the return of Casor. The court initially found in favor of Parker, but Johnson appealed. In 1655, the court reversed its ruling. Finding that Anthony Johnson still "owned" John Casor, the court ordered that he be returned with the court dues paid by Robert Parker.

This was the first instance of a judicial determination in the Thirteen Colonies holding that a person who had committed no crime could be held in servitude for life.

Though Casor was the first person declared a slave in a civil case, there were both black and white indentured servants sentenced to lifetime servitude before him. Many historians describe indentured servant John Punch as the first documented slave (or slave for life) in America, as punishment for escaping in 1640. Punch was required to "serve his said master or his assigns for the time of his natural Life here or elsewhere". The Punch case was significant because it established the disparity between his sentence as a negro and that of the two European indentured servants who escaped with him (one described as Dutch and one as a Scotsman). It is the first documented case in Virginia of an African sentenced to lifetime servitude. It is considered one of the first legal cases to make a racial distinction between black and white indentured servants.
 

Ethnic Vagina Finder

The Great Paper Chaser
Bushed
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
55,563
Reputation
3,070
Daps
157,129
Reppin
North Jersey but I miss Cali :sadcam:
So American slavery was a black man's fault?:camby::camby:

no but I’m not gonna absolve him because he was black :mjpls:

he use to be a slave and sued to keep another breh permanently enslaved. Whoever had a part in slavery, black, white or Indian can all get it :pacspit:

the fact that he set a legal precedent for cacs to site makes him a fukking sellout c00n fukk nikka. :pacspit:


And that goes for any black people that owned slaves in this country.


And this happened BEFORE America existed by the way.
 

Starman

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
16,345
Reputation
-2,810
Daps
36,164
no but I’m not gonna absolve him because he was black :mjpls:

he use to be a slave and sued to keep another breh permanently enslaved. Whoever had a part in slavery, black, white or Indian can all get it :pacspit:

the fact that he set a legal precedent for cacs to site makes him a fukking sellout c00n fukk nikka. :pacspit:


And that goes for any black people that owned slaves in this country.


And this happened BEFORE America existed by the way.

Do you know how many white slave owners you had to bypass to find this guy? And legal precedent my foot. White slave owners wanted to find a way and they would have regardless of this guy's existence.
 

Fillerguy

Veteran
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
20,227
Reputation
5,271
Daps
85,404
Reppin
North Jersey
This is only problematic if you take his life out of context. Whites were going to legalize slavery as we know it, with or without Johnson. Look up the John Punch story.... it occured before Johnson, i believe. Johnson owned white and Black servants, not slaves, but Whites America legally did not consider Us citizens. The Punch decision caused this distinction.

Johnson was a slave who grew up to become one of the richest men in the state. He would latet leave Virginia because cacs past a law saying the children of slaves were slaves, Johnson wanted to protect his family wealth. Unfortunately Johnson's new land in Maryland was taken from his wife after his death and given to a white man; a man born a slave is not citizen.

This man is as much a victim of slavery as any of our peoples in chains. He believed he could thrive in this country despite what was happening to his people because Whites allowed him to. Once he got too big for his britches, cacs ran his pockets.
Johnsons family wealth was taken within a generation.
 

Joe Sixpack

Build and Destroy
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
41,139
Reputation
5,739
Daps
115,434
Reppin
Rotten Apple
What’s the beef breh? This was a fascinating story.
Its based on the shyt he was saying in that Joe Biden shouldn’t be President thread he made. He was going on and on saying smart dumb nikka babble that was dumb.

Now he makes a thread about a black slave owner helping set the precedent for Slavery :hhh:

Its obvious what his angle is
 
Top