null
...
The link you guys ignore when @HarlemHottie posts it up over and over again.
Also, like I said, I am not going to amalgamate Black people as one monolith group, when it is time to throw around blame, when that is never done when it is time to throw around accolades. No, we will separate both and give blame where blame is due.
so more FBA "black americans" voted for Trump than the other groups, is what you are saying?
at least that is what that report is saying.
so you mean that "the blame" should be correctly apportioned to "FBAs"?
I am not surprised by this disingenuous response by you. In fact, I expected it. That is why I also posted up a graph, because I knew you would expose your own stupidity.
Quote: "Black male voters surveyed were U.S.-born (79.61%). In contrast, fewer were foreign-born (11.83%) or second-generation Black American men (8.56%)."
Quote: "Whopping 30% of them casting their votes for him. This support far exceeds the 11% from their U.S.-born counterparts, while second-generation Black American men exhibited even less support for Donald Trump, with only 10% backing him."
Therefore:
Q1. Which number is bigger: A, B or C?
Q2. Which number is bigger: A or (B + C)?
A: US born: 11% (vote percentage) * .7961 (population proportion)
B: Foreign born: 30% (vote percentage) * .1183 (population proportion)
C: Second gen: 10% (vote percentage) * .0856 (population proportion)
![]()
Which still means that 30% Foreign born Black men who voted, selected for Trump. None of what you stated changes that original argument. You trying to erect a new argument up in order to protect them from what is already shown, exposes you for what you are.
Simply put, the statement was that people were manipulated to vote for Trump. The stats show that per-capita, that manipulation was far more effective in getting Foreign born Black men to support Trump than native born. You want to do your break down, you create a new argument that discusses that.
just for the record
