BREAKING: Charlie Kirk shot dead by a sniper at event in Utah. Suspect caught, right wing weirdo

Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
54,412
Reputation
25,025
Daps
253,625
Reppin
St louis
Everybody knew the shooter was
one of them.
UKVu0t8.gif
 

Paper Boi

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
75,609
Reputation
27,286
Daps
491,814
Reppin
NULL
Staged? no way






so what charlie kirk gonna do? go into hiding for the rest of his life? they keep talking about how useful he was to conservatives. why would they want him fake dead then?

conspiracy theorists dumb ass hell
 
Last edited:

Adeptus Astartes

Loyal servant of the God-Brehmperor
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2019
Messages
12,432
Reputation
3,272
Daps
75,533
Reppin
Imperium of Man
Opposition to DEI/"Affirmative Action" was not indictment on the intelligence of black people - more on the policy decisions (and those that support such policies) of liberal whites.
I suspect if pressed you could provide example of his judgement of black people as a whole, but that would be no different than my judgement of whites or yours of conservatives - none of which is grounds for assassination.
Different opinions don't make enemies, attempts to force those beliefs on others does. Kirk operated in the open and with transparency. He traveled across the country inviting debate armed with a mic and his faith. I didn't follow him, but snippets of his debates would occasionally cross my feed.
When I don't agree with something/someone and there is no redemption, I ignore them. I'm troubled and confused as to why so many are celebrating this act. What did this man do or say that was so egregious that such a cowardly act should cause fanfare?


Except he directly insulted these women, saying they "lacked brain processing power". Direct quote.

Also, criticism of DEI without criticism of nepotism and legacy systems is absolutely a thinly veiled attack on Black people. He doesn't have an issue with unqualified people, he has an issue with minorities.

And yes, different opinions can absolutely make enemies. Nazism, Maoism, white supremacy, antisemitism, salafism...all started as mere "difference of opinion" before they became genocidal authoritarian ideology. Kirks brand of reactionary white protestant nationalism with a smile is a dangerous in a pluralistic liberal republic.

I don't like that he was murdered, but I'm not shedding tears for him because he would shed none for me.
 

klutch2381

A Doctor of Love
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
7,612
Reputation
2,907
Daps
27,381
Reppin
If you think you're lonely now, ohhh girl...
Kirk “debating” people doesnt hide the fact he was a white supremacist and a fascist. The world is a better place without him or people like him.

“Debating” people isn’t even what he did. He just espoused bad faith arguments openly. For instance, two different coroners corroborated that Floyd was killed via asphyxiation. Yet, Kirk a community college dropout with no formal education or medical education would say definitively, “Oh, Chauvin was innocent. Floyd was already dying. It was a fentanyl overdose. Chauvin should be pardoned. He’s innocent.”

He basically argued from radical skepticism standpoint, and it’s extremely hard to prove a negative. For example, how do we REALLY know there is not a green swan somewhere? How do we really know black people aren’t just intellectually inferior? More bestial? More prone to violence? All White supremacist logics operate off these kinds of tactics.
 

MegaManX

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
3,405
Reputation
6,465
Daps
17,238
Nick Fuentes is further right. He is like right before Full blown skin head Neo Nazi. Both are evolved Richard Spencer/David Duke types who misrepresent data to trip up uninformed/emotional people but Nick will flat out say the N word and stuff while Kirk will still remain coded

Nick Fuentes is not further right, unless you define it a certain way.

For instance, Kirk is straight up exactly what the party wants all the time and ONLY BENDS when the base is outraged. He didn't randomly become concerned about Israel. He got pressured by America First going rogue.

Nick is crazy racist BUT he also is crazy isolationist.

He says Israel is killing innocent muslims. At the same time, he is also saying "I don't want to live near muslims."

Nick is basically a damn wild card. You can rely on him to have racist takes, but you can't rely on him to support genocidal and interventionist stances.
 

FukkaPaidEmail

Retired Hoodrat whisperer
Joined
May 5, 2012
Messages
24,084
Reputation
4,503
Daps
92,855
Reppin
The Diaspora
Alright yall putting wayyyy too much respect on this dude name..talking about he’s Goebbels and shyt :laff::laff:

He was a popular racist that had a decent following but at the end of the day he wasn’t no damn power player… yall putting these extras on this dude is just elevating his status in death
 
Top