Brock Lesnar went over HHH in that feud but whatever
"Brock had no business losing to Cena or Hunter"
- Thread starter R=G
- Start date
It was weird them playing him as a monster, then you remembering how beatable he is. I don't mean put him on a Goldberg streak, but I don't understand how this played out. It kind of undermined what they seemed to be trying to do with him. It's like they did it in reverse, his first run, it was too quick, and later his losses came too soon.
Rayzah
I'm Everywhere you ain't never there
I mean I get HHH never got to work with him in their prime so he probably wanted to do it whole he still could.... But that should have been a one off and cena should have been the feud..
I also think him trading wins and loses with punk and HHH made him not look like the monster that he is.. I think if anybody should be undefeated it should have been a part timer who barely lost when he was full time.. And yes they should have mentioned how taker never beat him before during the build it would have made it look like he had a chance.. So yes in retrospect they aren't using him right but it's the wwe in 2014 what do you expect ... Until they Get some new people with fresh ideas in complete control this will continue
I also think him trading wins and loses with punk and HHH made him not look like the monster that he is.. I think if anybody should be undefeated it should have been a part timer who barely lost when he was full time.. And yes they should have mentioned how taker never beat him before during the build it would have made it look like he had a chance.. So yes in retrospect they aren't using him right but it's the wwe in 2014 what do you expect ... Until they Get some new people with fresh ideas in complete control this will continue
Nintendough
#Kliq
^^They always find ways to justify the backwards Cena booking. It's tradition.
Pinyapplesuckas
He's A Good Man
oh wow holy shytNot Brock's first match back though
Art Barr
INVADING SOHH CHAMPION
brock losing to cripple ache is why this company lost the money it lost.
this company booked thirteen plus years of cripple ache and his non-working buddies.
so, when the network debuted...
there was no recent history of quality to bring in casual fans.
as casual fans in general do not like triple h.
if they did,...wwe would not have been on the decline drawing wise since, mania2ooo.
once, the wwe disrespected the fanbase at mania 2000.
then, continued to book the son-in-law, and the clique buddies as the top tier for thirteen plus years.
eventually when it came time to cash in on the catalog from those years.
which the network is, a cash grab on the recent catalog to general fans.
the lack of draw and interest in a clique run company with the son-in-law at the top.
was reflective of the loss of close to 800M.
the only profit the wwe made was from cutting payroll, and that is not a real profit.
that is just making away to post profits with revenue.
that would have generally been just revenue, and not a real profit.
the entire loss is on the triple H/clique based draw from 99-2014.
yet, it will not be pr'd by this company as such.
as they don't like to admit when they were wrong.
when, for close to fifteen years, any smart told and emphatically warned this company.
about an eventual loss for their clique based obsession and direction.
also, if you don't believe me the catalog is worthless.
go to those discount stores, and look in the video aisle.
you can grab a decade of ppv's from 2001-2010.
for twenty dollars for every ppv, totaling twenty dollars, and they sit on the shelves.
they sit because no one that is a general fan has an interest in watching clique based buddies of triple h.
go over, and go over, over and over again....
nobody wants to indulge in the dreggs of that.
as it is a slap in the face to the general fan's perceptions.
from quality to suspending belief, productwise.
art barr
this company booked thirteen plus years of cripple ache and his non-working buddies.
so, when the network debuted...
there was no recent history of quality to bring in casual fans.
as casual fans in general do not like triple h.
if they did,...wwe would not have been on the decline drawing wise since, mania2ooo.
once, the wwe disrespected the fanbase at mania 2000.
then, continued to book the son-in-law, and the clique buddies as the top tier for thirteen plus years.
eventually when it came time to cash in on the catalog from those years.
which the network is, a cash grab on the recent catalog to general fans.
the lack of draw and interest in a clique run company with the son-in-law at the top.
was reflective of the loss of close to 800M.
the only profit the wwe made was from cutting payroll, and that is not a real profit.
that is just making away to post profits with revenue.
that would have generally been just revenue, and not a real profit.
the entire loss is on the triple H/clique based draw from 99-2014.
yet, it will not be pr'd by this company as such.
as they don't like to admit when they were wrong.
when, for close to fifteen years, any smart told and emphatically warned this company.
about an eventual loss for their clique based obsession and direction.
also, if you don't believe me the catalog is worthless.
go to those discount stores, and look in the video aisle.
you can grab a decade of ppv's from 2001-2010.
for twenty dollars for every ppv, totaling twenty dollars, and they sit on the shelves.
they sit because no one that is a general fan has an interest in watching clique based buddies of triple h.
go over, and go over, over and over again....
nobody wants to indulge in the dreggs of that.
as it is a slap in the face to the general fan's perceptions.
from quality to suspending belief, productwise.
art barr
Eight months?
Nah the feud started the night after Extreme Rules 2012:
And ended at Extreme Rules 2013:
shyt lasted over a year smh
