brock lesnar = ratings?

[captaincharisma]

meltzer

Raw rating was a

3.5 - an excellent number for a two hour show, let alone a three hour show.

 

[R=G]

 

[InstantKlassik]

 

[no fukks given]

rating goes down without Rock.

filed.

understood.

 

[Swiggy]

 

[R=G]

meltzer

Team Bring it..you gotta love how things instantly become more watched after Punk loses the belt and the fans assumed Rock was there and knew Lesnar would be there for the follow up

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

Team Bring it..you gotta love how things instantly become more watched after Punk loses the belt and the fans assumed Rock was there and knew Lesnar would be there for the follow up

Has nothing to do with Punk losing the belt. Its Mania season, dummy.

 

[R=G]

Please...for a 3 hour show, it would be 2.4s without no real names around.

 

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

damn so .1 drop without rock, oh no the business is failing

 

[R=G]

He was assumed to be there by the audience...lol. Kids on the Net are too much

 

[Mr. Negative]

ratings spike cause vince got injured last week.

 

[DoubleJ13]

I still don't understand the fascination with ratings around here

Unless WWE is sending you a check or WWE has competition what difference does this shyt make?

 

[GoddamnyamanProf]

I still don't understand the fascination with ratings around here

Unless WWE is sending you a check or WWE has competition what difference does this shyt make?

Gives nerds something to argue about between shows. Hasn't mattered in the way wrestlefags want it to since WCW was around.

 

[WOAHMYGOODNESS]

you just said in another thread people who thought the rock was showing up were naive

pick a arguement and stick to it lol

 

[captaincharisma]

Gives nerds something to argue about between shows. Hasn't mattered in the way wrestlefags want it to since WCW was around.

says the cm punk groupie

But if punk was drawing you'd be the biggest wrestlefag talking about them



when smarks stop talking about ratings?