California bans schools from using "Redskins" name.

notPsychosiz

I started this gangsta sh-
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
7,638
Reputation
2,911
Daps
21,914
Reppin
dogbornwolf
California Becomes First State To Ban 'Redskins' Team Name

Gotta say... Cali has been on point lately.



California became the first state to ban public schools from using "Redskins" as a team name, nickname or mascot on Sunday in a move applauded by Native American activists.

Signed into law by Gov. Jerry Brown (D), the California Racial Mascots Act, authored by Assemblyman Luis Alejo (D), outlaws schools' use of the slur effective Jan. 1, 2017.

ThankU, @JerryBrownGov, for signing AB30 to phase out "Redskins" mascots in all CA public schools! 1st IN THE NATION pic.twitter.com/14MGjw9mRV

— Asm. Luis Alejo (@AsmLuisAlejo) October 11, 2015
Oneida Indian Nation Representative Ray Halbritter and National Congress of American Indians Executive Director Jackie Pata, who lead the advocacy group Change the Mascot, praised Alejo and Brown in a joint statement.

“They have set a shining example for other states across the country, and for the next generation, by demonstrating a commitment to the American ideals of inclusion and mutual respect," they wrote.

"The most populous state in the country has now taken a stand against the use of this insidious slur in its schools, and Change the Mascot expects more states to follow."

Only four schools are currently using Native team names: Gustine High School in Merced County, Calaveras High School in Calaveras County, Chowchilla Union High School in Madera County and Tulare Union High School in Tulare County.

"I am very disappointed regarding the passage of this Bill and I am looking forward to the funding our district will receive to implement the passage of this Act," Gustine superintendent Bill Morones wrote to The Huffington Post.

A press release Tulare superintendent Sarah Koligian sent HuffPost also expressed discontent.

"On behalf of the Tulare Joint Union High School District we are disappointed to hear that Governor Brown signed AB 30," it read. "We will adhere to the law as it is written."

The other district superintendents did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment.

Nationwide, high schools are the most frequent appropriators of Native American names and slurs as team names, a FiveThirtyEight study found last year. Of the 2,128 high school, college, semi-pro and amateur teams using such names, 92 percent are in high schools.

Halbritter and Pata are using the passage of California's bill to amp up pressure on the Washington, D.C., NFL team to ditch its "Redskins" name.

"Their historic step to build a better future stands in stark contrast to the dogged inaction of Washington’s NFL team, which in the face of all the evidence that this term degrades and offends Native Americans, continues to defend and promote the slur for its own financial gain," they wrote. "This landmark legislation eliminating the R-word in California schools clearly demonstrates that this issue is not going away, and that opposition to the Washington team on this issue is only intensifying. The NFL should act immediately to press the team to change the name.”
 

notPsychosiz

I started this gangsta sh-
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
7,638
Reputation
2,911
Daps
21,914
Reppin
dogbornwolf
Red skins is not racist

:camby:
I'm part native, and I find it offensive personally.
Calling me redskin or 'a redskin' is no different than a person addressing me as blackskin or 'a blackskin'

And I know if I overhear some cacs calling me "a blackskin", its lit same as if they had said ****** or any other term they think is cute.
:martin:
 

George's Dilemma

Banned
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
27,794
Reputation
7,435
Daps
136,125
That's a Native Term before whites came to America

The Real History of the Word Redskin. It's Not What You Think.


Did you read the article? The same article you provided a link for? If you did you would have noticed this gem from the beginning of the article.


"As Washington mopes to the end of a losing NFL season, the controversy over the team's name appears to have plenty of fight left. To the language hound, however, the most remarkable aspect of this dispute may be its lack of historical context.

This fact, it's important to emphasize, is entirely separate from whether people today, Native Americans especially, rightly find the term offensive. That's an assertion that has been tested empirically and debated with some gusto (with comments from President Obama, Bob Costas, Slate editor David Plotz, and numerous other public figures), but does not concern us here."



I appreciate you posting the link as it's an interesting read. Still, regardless of the word's history, it's modern day usage is offensive to Native Americans, and really that's all that matters IMO. The article you linked agrees with that.
 

southpawstyle

Superstar
Joined
Aug 31, 2013
Messages
4,366
Reputation
1,405
Daps
15,708
Reppin
California
I cant believe on this forum people think Redskins isnt racist. Whites considered Native Americans one of them until they wouldn't assimilate to their culture so they labeled them red rather than Caucasian to solidify their place in society.

"WHEN THOMAS JEFFERSON WROTE his Notes on the State of Virginia (1784), he professed
to draw heavily "on what I have seen of man, white, red, and black." Here, as
elsewhere, Jefferson demonstrated a knack for phraseology: he was probably the
first public spokesman to use the tricolor metaphor that has flourished, with minor
rearrangement, ever since.' And now, with the historical profession's increasing
attention to race and ethnicity, "red, white, and black" is enjoying a rhetorical boom.
Attracted by the color trilogy's symmetry and symbolism, scholars have recently
employed it in numerous book and article titles. Color terminology is as firmly fixed
in writings on early America as it is in conversations about modern race relations"

From White Man to Redskin: Changing Anglo-American Perceptions of the American Indian
 
Top