Cam Newton talks poloygamy and the Bible

[valet]

 

[Dave24]

@Sccit what do you think about what Cam Newton said?

 

[In The Zone '98]

As a man, I can have as many women who are willing to follow me.

 

[LuuqMaan]

Are the modern society pushing for ‘backward’ ideologies?

Cam Newton saying ‘high value man’. Kev Samuels was more mainstream than we thought for real

 

[Sccit]

@Sccit what do you think about what Cam Newton said?

WILL CHECK SOON N HOLLA BACK

 

[Spiritual Stratocaster]

Western society ain't built for plural marriages.

Especially the women...they've been sold the fairytale wedding ...the concept of openly sharing a man to most women is absurd just going by what I see they wouldn't rock it.

 

[kronix]

Monogamy will die out with Christianity. Give it a few more decades.

 

[Akata Man Bromo]

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

He's an idiot and using eisegesis which is invalid for interpretation.​

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Monogamy will die out with Christianity. Give it a few more decades.

Lol. Neither of them are going anywhere, breh.

They just evolve.​

 

[The Fade]

If you doing polygamy just so you can satisfy sexual urges you’re stupid

Now if you’re solidifying land, and treaties and bringing groups together like the House of Saud did by fukking all those Arab warlords daughters.. it’s smart

Sex by itself doesn’t make you a king like coli brehs think it does.

 

[Wig Twistin Season]

 

[kronix]

Lol. Neither of them are going anywhere, breh.

They just evolve.​

Yea I wouldn't say die out but will no longer be the default state of relations.

 

[TreySav]

Cam sounds like one of those people who put their individualistic tendencies and inability to control themselves over the betterment of the greater community. Rome wasn’t built in a day and neither were the ideas of marriage and monogamy. Outside of religious beliefs, marriage and monogamy developed for practical reasons such as mitigating neighborhood conflicts (folks are less likely to burn the village down if their kids wives live in it), weed out older established men from using that advantage to court in a younger man’s dating pool, prevent older women who’re outside child bearing age from taking eligible young men for themselves, provide a direct ancestral lineage of heirs, safeguard against the spread of diseases, build on the previous generation, provide stability and protection for families, give men a purpose in using their natural inclinations of providing and protecting, keep a steady and replenishable workforce, avoid out of wedlock children (having a b*stard child was seen undermining the common good in some societies), and finally to prevent men like Future and women like Brittany Renner from continuing to play in the dating pool of marriageable people. If you were 30 years old and not married in the early 1900s, many people considered you to be a loser, but now all of that stigma has been removed due to the sexual revolution. Men saw it as an opportunity to get more sex with less responsibilities, corporations saw it as an opportunity make more money, and women saw it as an opportunity to remove stigmas surrounding women’s sexual desires and their struggles with societal acceptance of issues like single motherhood

Some of things that occurred during the sexual revolution were for the betterment of women but some also led to the proverbial throwing out the baby with the bath water

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Yea I wouldn't say die out but will no longer be the default state of relations.

That ain't happening, either, unless there's a nuclear war or some other catastrophe.

Monogamy and belief in a 'Higher Power' keep humans......human.​