Can Libertarianism Exist When AI Tales Over?

Prince.Skeletor

Don’t Be Like He-Man
Joined
Jul 5, 2012
Messages
29,525
Reputation
-6,892
Daps
57,697
Reppin
Bucktown
If humans can’t compete with AI labor loses all market value.
Wages would collapse. There would be no buyers for human labor which and the core mechanism of wealth distribution in capitalism breaks down

Owners of AI systems (likely a few massive corporations or individuals) capture nearly all economic value.

Capitalism relies on consumers with money
If most people can’t earn money, they can’t buy goods, and demand disappears.

Libertarian free market capitalism requires a functioning labor market. If AI makes labor economically useless, the ideological foundation of libertarianism then personal responsibility through voluntary labor exchange ceases to function. Either libertarianism adapts, or it gets replaced by a new paradigm like perhaps AI techno-feudalism, UBI-backed social democracy, or something entirely novel.

So there’s only two options:

AI Techno-Feudalism:
A future system where a small elite owns and controls the AI, data, and infrastructure, and the rest of society becomes economically dependent on them, not through wages, but through digital fiefdoms.
People’s access to food, housing, entertainment, or even purpose may be entirely platform-based (e.g., Meta, Google, Amazon ecosystems)

Or


UBI-Backed Social Democracy:
A more optimistic and humane vision where the productivity of AI is taxed or socialized, and the wealth is redistributed especially through Universal Basic Income (UBI) and expanded public services.
AI and automation are seen as public goods, and heavily taxed to fund social program

ChatGPT helped me with the tables below:

FeatureAI Techno-FeudalismUBI-Backed Social Democracy
Economic PowerConcentrated in tech elitesDistributed via taxes and UBI
Human Labor RoleLargely obsolete and unneededOptional, but meaningful roles encouraged
Freedom & AutonomyLimited; platform dependenceExpanded through economic security
Government RoleWeak or captured by corporationsStrong and redistributive
Outcome for Most PeopleDigital serfsEmpowered citizens

Which Countries are going where?

Country/RegionCurrent TrajectoryModel Leaning Toward
United StatesDeregulated AI, Big Tech ruleAI Techno-Feudalism (with democratic pushback)
FinlandUBI trials, ethical AIUBI-Backed Social Democracy
ChinaState-run AI, mass controlAuthoritarian Techno-Capitalism
SpainMinimum income, worker reformUBI-Backed Social Democracy (early stage)
SingaporeAI in public life, state techTechnocratic AI Social Capitalism
Sweden/DenmarkTech + redistributionSocial Democracy w/ AI integration
 

Roadside

Pro
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
222
Reputation
0
Daps
812
People still play chess and have chess tournaments even though computers are way better.

"AI makes labor economically useless" is a meaningless pie in the sky idea. People will always put a premium on something "human made" and there is no signs of AI doing any real improvements in physical jobs. Many people have now become millionaires streaming - playing videogames online - providing 0 "economic benefit beyond human entiertainment. Mr Beast is now a household name multi millionaire doing a job that didnt exist 20 years ago.

If AI becomes perfect and does all the computer jobs perfectly humans will just adapt the same way they did when machines took the majority of the farming jobs. Luddite - Wikipedia Luddites destroyed weaving machines because they were so scared that everyone would be put out of a job. People just got richer and moved on to better things.
 
Top