Cena has been hyping up and claiming he has liked guys like Cesaro and Big E for over two years, right? I believe so...he says all the right cute little things in the post matches after he goes over but with him being so phony, who knows what that really means. This is a guy who uses cancer children as a mechanism to generate cheers when the fans are more into his heel opponents. So it's a wash. Either way..Cesaro proved he was a better performer than Cena outright last week as Cena was botching and stumbling at certain intervals during the match while Cesaro shined like a diamond. I'm not impressed with the Cena title run..at first he was burying finishers left and right..he did a couple of things where it seemed Neville had him beat and Cesaro had him beat but he got that win back on Cesaro as expected. He's slick. He's political. Sort of like Cripple H from the 2000 and 2001 run...he had a host of great opponents and he got more deserved credit he should of gotten in those situations until he was exposed two years later when the talent range went down and he was stinking up the joint with RVD, Kane, and burying Booker.
Cesaro shouldn't need a Cena match to get pushed...they MADE SURE they made Blandy a star, right?? He doesn't draw....he doesn't get ratings..his merchandise isn't doing shyt...his DVDs don't sell..he's a chump and they got him making easy money, taking vacations after every two programs, and goofy shyt like that. But Cesaro doesn't get that same fixture, does he? It's a bias and I'll never credit the ones who they are bias towards over the guy who actually is proving himself.