Chemotherapy Kills 50% of Patients

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
367
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
Exaggerated headline but the point stands. Chemo is a killer.

Legalize cannabis and help fix this broken medical system.

Chemo = radiation = poison

Chemotherapy warning as hundreds die from cancer-fighting drugs

Patients should be warned about the dangers of chemotherapy after research showed that cancer drugs are killing up to 50 per cent of patients in some hospitals.

For the first time researchers looked at the numbers of cancer patients who died within 30 days of starting chemotherapy, which indicates that the medication is the cause of death, rather than the cancer.

The study by Public Health England and Cancer Research UK found that across England around 8.4 per cent of patients with lung cancer, and 2.4 per cent of breast cancer patients died within a month.

But in some hospitals the figure was far higher. In Milton Keynes the death rate for lung cancer treatment was 50.9 per cent, although it was based on a very small number of patients.


breast_cancer_3591922b-large_trans++pJliwavx4coWFCaEkEsb3kvxIt-lGGWCWqwLa_RXJU8.jpg

Patients should be warned about the dangers of chemotherapy
At Lancashire Teaching Hospitals the 30 day mortality rate was 28 per cent for palliative chemotherapy for lung cancer, which is given when a cure is not expected and treatment given to alleviate symptoms.

Deaths of lung cancer patients from chemotherapy were also far higher than the national average in Blackpool, Coventry, Derby, South Tyneside and Surrey and Sussex, according to the research.

Similarly, around one in five people who underwent palliative care for breast cancer at Cambridge University Hospitals died from their treatment.

Public Health England (PHE), said it had contacted the hospitals concerned to ask them to review practices.

Dr Jem Rashbass, Cancer Lead for PHE, said: “Chemotherapy is a vital part of cancer treatment and is a large reason behind the improved survival rates over last four decades.

“However, it is powerful medication with significant side effects and often getting the balance right on which patients to treat aggressively can be hard.

“Those hospitals whose death rates are outside the expected range have had the findings shared with them and we have asked them to review their practice and data.”

The study looked at more than 23,000 women with breast cancer and nearly 10,000 men with 9634 non-small cell lung cancer who underwent chemotherapy in 2014. Of those treated 1,383 died within 30 days.

Chemotherapy is toxic for the body because it does not discriminate between healthy and cancerous cells.

The researchers also found that there were significant differences in survival for older people and those in poorer health. They advised doctors to be more careful in selecting patients for treatment where it could do more harm than good.

“The statistics don’t suggest bad practice overall but there are some outliers,” said Professor David Dodwell, Institute of Oncology, St James Hospital, Leeds, UK.

“It could be data problems, and figures skewed because of just a few deaths, but nevertheless it could also be down to problems with clinical practice.

“I think it’s important to make patients aware that there are potentially life threatening downsides to chemotherapy. And doctors should be more careful about who they treat with chemotherapy.”

Professor David Cameron, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, Scotland, added: “The concern is that some of the patients dying within 30 days of being given chemo probably shouldn’t have been given the chemo. But, how many ? There is no easy way to answer that, but perhaps looking at those places/hospitals where the death rate was higher might help.

“Furthermore, if we give less chemo then some patients will die because they didn’t get chemo. It’s a fine balance and the more data we have the better we can be at making sure we get the balance right.”

Professor Peter Johnson, Cancer Research UK’s chief clinician, said: “Chemotherapy is an important part of treatment for many people with cancer. Having information about how well it is being delivered is vitally important to patients and to the health service.”

All the hospitals named said they had since reviewed the cases and were satisfied that chemotherapy prescribing was safe.

The research was published in The Lancet Oncology.
 

plushcarpet

Superstar
Joined
Aug 12, 2015
Messages
3,536
Reputation
445
Daps
13,032
It certainly helps a lot of people but we need to advance the treatment of cancer into a less lethal procedure. There has to be a better way to kill poison than with other poison.
agreed
they need to AT LEAST allow full testing of marijuana by doctors and scientists

at the moment they are very limited in running trials/experiments because of the way it's classified, which is all sorts of fukked
 
  • Dap
Reactions: Oso

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
367
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
agreed
they need to AT LEAST allow full testing of marijuana by doctors and scientists

at the moment they are very limited in running trials/experiments because of the way it's classified, which is all sorts of fukked

DEA gave the Ok for doing research on it when they made their statement a few weeks back regarding re-scheduling cannabis. Hopefully the test results come back sooner than later.
 

Dominoes

All Star
Joined
May 18, 2014
Messages
987
Reputation
250
Daps
3,283
Reppin
Myself
Everybody reacts differently to different types of treatment.

Why is that so difficult for people to accept:dahell:?
 

ill

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
10,234
Reputation
367
Daps
17,297
Reppin
Mother Russia & Greater Israel
Shoving marijuana up your ass isn't going to cure cancer. You're welcome to link me to a peer reviewed journal of non quacks though.

Cannabis and Cannabinoids

60 Peer-Reviewed Studies on Medical Marijuana - Medical Marijuana - ProCon.org

Pathways mediating the effects of cannabidiol on the reduction of breast cancer cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. - PubMed - NCBI

Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents. - PubMed - NCBI

This was all done in a limited fashion as cannabis is a Schedule 1 drug that was not allowed to be researched outside of one or two government programs. Like I said earlier, the DEA is starting to allow scientists to research the benefits so in a few years you will see a ton of peer reviewed journals verifying this info.

Is the NCBI non-quack enough for you?
 

EndDomination

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 22, 2014
Messages
31,857
Reputation
7,427
Daps
111,963
Cannabis does not cure cancer.
Chemotherapy is poisonous, that's the point of the treatment, its not "healthy" for you, its literally killing the cancer cells.
Same for radiation therapy, it causes cellular death, concentrated on cancer cells.
Now, I definitely support further research into cannabis as a treatment for cancer, but so far haven't seen its use as an effective anti-cancer treatment (part of the issue is that there is a broad spectrum of cancer(s) and treatment varies).
Its support seems to be dominated by fringe groups that are also anti-vax and think the pharmaceutical industry is purposely making us sick.
 
Top