Chris Paul not better than Steve Nash

[Leasy]

Both are stat whores but Nash was a better passer and didn't hold the ball too long. Christopher never did good in the playoffs with that team but I bet Steve Nash would at least made finals.

Nash was a better shooter too but lack defense where Paul is a little better.

Waiting for the hate but it's facts

 

[ManBearPig]

Naah had a better shot and that's it.

U don't think CP3's clippers wouldn't make it to the WCFs in 2006

 

[ghostwriterx]

Both are stat whores but Nash was a better passer and didn't hold the ball too long. Christopher never did good in the playoffs with that team but I bet Steve Nash would at least made finals.

Nash was a better shooter too but lack defense where Paul is a little better.

Waiting for the hate but it's facts

 

[Leasy]

Naah had a better shot and that's it.

U don't think CP3's clippers wouldn't make it to the WCFs in 2006

Hell nall breh you tripping. What reason you think they would of made it? Chris Paul even with loaded teams and can't do shyt at least Nash had the Spurs in prime etc...

 

[ManBearPig]

Hell nall breh you tripping. What reason you think they would of made it? Chris Paul even with loaded teams and can't do shyt at least Nash had the Spurs in prime etc...

'08 Spurs were the defending champs
'09 Nuggets went to WCFs
'11 Lakers were the defending champs and West was out
'12 Spurs had the best record in the NBA
'13 Grizzlies were 56-26 and went to WCFs
'14 Thunder won 58-24 but yeah Chris Paul choked
'15 Rockets were 57-25 but the Clippers had a major meltdown
16 clippers were injured


a Chris paul led team were always eliminated by teams that were good enough to win the whole thing besides the Rockets.. but I think the Rockets could be the Cavs with Kyrie and Love out so....

 

[King Jove]

Steve Nash played NO defense so I'm gonna sit back and see how y'all finesse this for future debates.

 

[Serious]

you really are going for coliseum's worst now

@Miggs

 

[CokeMoneyGuns]

Only few things are FACTS in da game of basketball. And dis aint one of them , I do believe Chris Paul is a better player , on offense i throw u a bone and say its a wash , but defensively Nash was a traffic cone , now u might prefer Nash cuz his game was more flashy and freewheeling , but Chris Paul da type player that u can throw 4 random people wit and he will have an efficient offense cuz of his meticulous and overall mastery of da point guard position. And im not even goin get started on da Mr.Pringles effect.

 

[feelosofer]

I'm a Steve Nash fan and I disagree with this. Chris Paul is the better overall player, although Nash is the better passer and better shooter. Paul is a better defender and slasher and actually they are comparable in efficiency.