CIA refuses to brief congress on Russian hack rumors
- Thread starter b_low_brown
- Start date
Hood Critic
The Power Circle
Not to say the Reds weren't responsible but the reality is the only "evidence" that it was them was discovery of the attackers speaking Russian which really means nothing.
I honestly feel like the CIA is using this to their benefit for this generation's cold war.
I honestly feel like the CIA is using this to their benefit for this generation's cold war.
newworldafro
DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
fukk these fakkits... Dont talk bout it, be about It!!!
Craig Murray assures us that he knows that these were not hacks but insider leaksand that he knows the leaker(s). Indeed he now tells us that the emails were handed over to him during a visits in Washington. Former intelligence officials including the technically very knowledgeable former NSA official William Binney concur that the hacking story is false.
All we have heard or seen so far are hearsay rumors and allegations of evidence. To me as experienced IT professional the case is technically laughable just as Murray explains here. If the claimed hacks occurred at all the alleged methods were so common that anybody could have done these. There is not even one claimed fact yet that is technically halfway acceptable as evidence that "Russia did it".
But still the NYT runs a big package of pieces telling us that "Russia did it" based on the non-factual CIA rumors and unprofessional IT assertions by Crowdstrike, the self-promoting IT security company the DNC hired and paid. Before that the Washington Post published major claims of Russian interference by anonymous officials. NBC News now tops that with "intelligence officials" saying Putin himself ran the hacking campaign. Authors of the story are the long time insider hacks Bill Arkin and Ken Dilanian known for clearing his stories with the CIA before publishing. The next story will tells us that Vladimir Valdimirovich himself was punching the keyboard.
All we have heard or seen so far are hearsay rumors and allegations of evidence. To me as experienced IT professional the case is technically laughable just as Murray explains here. If the claimed hacks occurred at all the alleged methods were so common that anybody could have done these. There is not even one claimed fact yet that is technically halfway acceptable as evidence that "Russia did it".
But still the NYT runs a big package of pieces telling us that "Russia did it" based on the non-factual CIA rumors and unprofessional IT assertions by Crowdstrike, the self-promoting IT security company the DNC hired and paid. Before that the Washington Post published major claims of Russian interference by anonymous officials. NBC News now tops that with "intelligence officials" saying Putin himself ran the hacking campaign. Authors of the story are the long time insider hacks Bill Arkin and Ken Dilanian known for clearing his stories with the CIA before publishing. The next story will tells us that Vladimir Valdimirovich himself was punching the keyboard.
b_low_brown
Daddyface
b_low_brown
Daddyface
And notice right after this the White House comes out and says Putin was directly responsible 
All these claims, no evidence, CIA doesn't come with receipts.. you'd be a fool to look at this objectively and not be Atleast somewhat skeptical of these accusations
All these claims, no evidence, CIA doesn't come with receipts.. you'd be a fool to look at this objectively and not be Atleast somewhat skeptical of these accusations
And notice right after this the White House comes out and says Putin was directly responsible
All these claims, no evidence, CIA doesn't come with receipts.. you'd be a fool to look at this objectively and not be Atleast somewhat skeptical of these accusations
This right here.
the cac mamba
Veteran
liberals 
what kinda dollar-cone shyt is this
what kinda dollar-cone shyt is this
Berniewood Hogan
IT'S BERNIE SANDERS WITH A STEEL CHAIR!
If the CIA hid the evidence in weird paintings in a pizza parlor, y'all would treat it as gospel.
b_low_brown
Daddyface
That implies the CIA has evidence.
