Class action filed on high school football

Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,054
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,498
http://www.cnn.com/2014/12/01/us/concussion-lawsuit-high-school-football/index.html?c=us

Class action filed on high school football

(CNN) - The legal fight over head injuries in football has made its way to the high school arena -- and is heading to court.

A former Illinois high school football player has filed a class-action lawsuit against the Illinois High School Association over concussions protocols and management.

"It's the first-ever class action filed against a state high school association," said attorney Joseph Siprut, who filed on behalf of 29-year-old Daniel Bukal.

Siprut also is the attorney who filed the class action against the NCAA over concussions -- the one that has reached a preliminary settlement with the NCAA that could change the rules of the college game if it's approved by a judge.

"Our goal is to bring the fight to the high school level," Siprut said.

Lawsuits already exist that seek damages from the NCAA and NFL over how concussions are handled in college and pro ball. But neurosurgeons say that adolescent head injuries can be the most damaging, since they happen during a crucial developmental period.

While the high school suit is, right now, only filed in Illinois, Siprut said the goal is to sue every state high school athletic association in the country, changing the rules in each state to make the game safer.

Bukal, who attended Notre Dame College Prep in Illinois from 1999 to 2003, had many concussions during his high school career, the lawsuit said, but was never educated on the effects or the risks.

More than 10 years later, he still suffers from migraines and memory loss, his lawsuit says.

The suit alleges that the IHSA has failed young athletes because it "does not mandate specific guidelines or rules on managing student-athlete concussions and head injuries," and "fails to mandate the removal of athletes who have appeared to suffer in practice (as opposed to games)."

It also does not have baseline testing, and does have medical staff with concussion training present at games, the suit says.

A spokesman for IHSA, which is a not-for-profit that regulates high school sports in the state, told CNN Monday that the suit was filed Saturday as the state's championship games were being played.

The spokesman, Matt Troha, assistant executive director, provided CNN with a statement released on Saturday by IHSA Executive Director Marty Hickman. "We will review the contents of the lawsuit in the coming days and comment if and when it is appropriate," Hickman said in the statement.

"Student-athlete risk minimization, especially as it relates to concussion management in high school football, is and remains a top priority of the IHSA. We believe that the IHSA, in working with national partners like the NFHS (National Federation of State High School Associations), has and will continue to be a leader in this area."

Bringing the legal fight to the high school level was almost inevitable. Similar lawsuits have been filed at the college and pro sport level, but both have met controversy.

The NCAA suit, which is awaiting a judge's ruling on a $75 million settlement, is opposed by many NCAA critics who say it doesn't go far enough and doesn't directly benefit any of the players who have been injured.

The $75 million would go to screening and research and lawyer fees, but not the players.

"The players are being sold out for $15 million in legal fees and the NCAA couldn't be happier," said Ramogi Huma, president of the National College Players Association. He says the NCAA settlement didn't address enough key issues that lead to head trauma, like the number of contact practices each season.

In pro football, an initial $765 million settlement was rejected by a federal judge, and then accepted later when the NFL agreed to put no cap on the monetary awards for thousands of former NFL players who have sued the league over injuries.


It's dying, brehs, enjoy it while it's here :mjcry:
 

Ed MOTHEREFFING G

Chances make champions
Joined
Sep 27, 2012
Messages
15,899
Reputation
3,923
Daps
56,700
Reppin
206 x 734
Straight up, why is Riddell, Nike, or Under Armor not spending EVERYTHING IN THE ENTIRE RESEARCH BUDGET to create a signifigantly better helmet / chinguard / mouthgaurd combo other than "more air pumped into the helmet"???

these dudes made shoes out of foam and shirts that absorb sweat...nike campus is better than 90% of Division 1 sports campuses...but they still using helmet tech from the 80s?
 

Trojan 24

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
43,843
Reputation
6,355
Daps
165,996
Reppin
Just Win Baby
Fairly certain I got a few concussions when I was playing youth football:patrice:

Whose down to join a class action with me :blessed:
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
Straight up, why is Riddell, Nike, or Under Armor not spending EVERYTHING IN THE ENTIRE RESEARCH BUDGET to create a signifigantly better helmet / chinguard / mouthgaurd combo other than "more air pumped into the helmet"???

these dudes made shoes out of foam and shirts that absorb sweat...nike campus is better than 90% of Division 1 sports campuses...but they still using helmet tech from the 80s?
Because they're not being sued. If and when the organizations that feed them are forced to make those changes, they will too. I guarantee you that they've begun its development. They're just waiting for the right time to bring it out and charge more $$.
 

tru_m.a.c

IC veteran
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
31,663
Reputation
6,972
Daps
91,533
Reppin
Gaithersburg, MD via Queens/LI
It's about time.

The lawsuits should've always been aimed at pop warner, high schools, and colleges first. Any lawsuit aimed at the NFL should be mirrored at every level of play. I never understood how/why NFL players could blame the NFL for not teaching them about the seriousness of concussions, while disregarding the fact that they played X amount of years before stepping foot in the NFL.

I'm lying, I know why. How would it look if your favorite alumni bankrupted his football program through a civil suit.
Now you can say the end of football (as we know it) is here :wow:
 

Trip

slippery slope
Joined
May 8, 2012
Messages
21,395
Reputation
257
Daps
18,345
Reppin
FL
Straight up, why is Riddell, Nike, or Under Armor not spending EVERYTHING IN THE ENTIRE RESEARCH BUDGET to create a signifigantly better helmet / chinguard / mouthgaurd combo other than "more air pumped into the helmet"???

these dudes made shoes out of foam and shirts that absorb sweat...nike campus is better than 90% of Division 1 sports campuses...but they still using helmet tech from the 80s?

the helmet technology has been significantly improved....you cant use the old Riddells or Schutts anymore except in the NFL.
 

Absolut

Superstar
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
15,896
Reputation
705
Daps
56,311
the nfl and ncaa have boatloads of money to combat this in court, payoff people, what ever the fukk they gotta do to keep litigation costs from reaching the stratosphere. high schools dont. the legs of the sport will slowly be taken out with youth and high school football folding up at schools across the country
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
My 7 year old nephew started playing this year. That helmet he has is insanely comfortable and padded really well. If there is any wiggle room at all, you just pump it until the head is completely pressured with soft air sacks on every side. Night and day from when I played with hard ass pads.
 
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
28,054
Reputation
4,853
Daps
104,498
Because they're not being sued. If and when the organizations that feed them are forced to make those changes, they will too. I guarantee you that they've begun its development. They're just waiting for the right time to bring it out and charge more $$.

I dapped for the first line, but I highly doubt the underlined. If they had better technology, they'd surely be pushing it (like you said higher profits) and now is the perfect climate to sell it with their biggest climates feeling heat.

Why would they wait until they start getting those legal bills/negative publicity? They could look like the good guys now.
 

Carlos Huerta

Just keep my rep red
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
7,004
Reputation
-292
Daps
8,733
Reppin
NULL
I dapped for the first line, but I highly doubt the underlined. If they had better technology, they'd surely be pushing it (like you said higher profits) and now is the perfect climate to sell it with their biggest climates feeling heat.

Why would they wait until they start getting those legal bills/negative publicity? They could look like the good guys now.
1. Because it costs more
2. Because the heat is not on them. It's on the organizations.
 
Top