Coli Lawyers, is this illegal? Deepfake related..

[UncleTomFord15]

Thinking of a hustle recently. If I was to use AI technology to create an artificial attractive women and create her a IG and an only fans for simps to donate to her account, is that illegal? I'm not technically using stealing another persons identity so; am I still breaking the law somehow?

 

[CreepyMcCreeperson]

 

[Nobu]

so you generate a fake face using AI, and paste it onto a real porn video deepfakes style?

if the face doesn't belong to any real person, that part is fine.

but i would think you could be violating the copyright of the person whose video you're pasting the face on. that could be an unauthorized modification for commercial purposes, it's definitely not fair use.

 

[MR. SNIFLES]

I THINK PASSING IT OFF AS A REAL PERSON IS THE ILLEGAL PART.

 

[Paper Boi]

it ain't illegal if you don't get caught

 

[ba'al]

I remember a breh on here posted about a virtual model agency. Dude would make virtual models and sell their images to companies to use in ads. Some even have social media accounts.

Thinking of a hustle recently. If I was to use AI technology to create an artificial attractive women and create her a IG and an only fans for simps to donate to her account, is that illegal? I'm not technically using stealing another persons identity so; am I still breaking the law somehow?

 

[Nobu]

I THINK PASSING IT OFF AS A REAL PERSON IS THE ILLEGAL PART.

I don't even think it's fraud. To charge someone with fraud, you have to prove that the person was harmed or suffered loss by the deceit.

If someone saw the face on IG, paid for the OnlyFans and got the porn with the same face as expected, have they been harmed?

I don't see how later figuring out the person doesn't exist in real life is considered criminally harming or damaging. You were never paying for the real life person by subscribing to the OnlyFans, you were paying for the digital content which you received. I can see why it would be disappointing, but I doubt a judge would consider that disappointment "harm" in a criminal sense as in real damage.

There are porn studios selling porn videos featuring people who don't exist in real life (dead pornstars) and that's not illegal.

 

[Thurgood Thurston III]

I don't know about the legality but you could certainly get away with it.

Just make sure that whatever you create is far enough from the source material that no one would notice and sue you.

 

[Jimmy from Linkedin]

we need the finest coli lawyers in here on this @boy @Stringer Cochran @SirReginald come let us know.


If you were to not state whether or not "she" was a "real woman" I don't think you would be doing anything wrong. I think it would actually make you more money if you explictly stated she was AI or a RealWomanTM. If you created an ML/Deep Learning chatbot type thing that started adapting to the simps and then using sometihng like GNN's would generate always "what they wanted to hear" from a "real woman." Then you could have them pay monthly to have access to the "phone number" to offset the GCP/AWS cloud costs.

 

[Fade Runner 2049]

I mean there’s already AI type porn. If you talking about deep faking a face onto a human body then who’s body would it be? Who would be the model?

 

[MR. SNIFLES]

I don't even think it's fraud. To charge someone with fraud, you have to prove that the person was harmed or suffered loss by the deceit.

If someone saw the face on IG, paid for the OnlyFans and got the porn with the same face as expected, have they been harmed?

I don't see how later figuring out the person doesn't exist in real life is considered criminally harming or damaging. You were never paying for the real life person by subscribing to the OnlyFans, you were paying for the digital content which you received. I can see why it would be disappointing, but I doubt a judge would consider that disappointment "harm" in a criminal sense as in real damage.

There are porn studios selling porn videos featuring people who don't exist in real life (dead pornstars) and that's not illegal.

DEAD PORNO STARS EXISTED.

I THINK YOU HAVE TO MARKET IT AS VR OR SOMETHING. SOME TELEMARKETING COMPANIES GOT IN TROUBLE FOR ROBO CALLS THAT HAD NAMES BUT THOSE PEOPLE DID NOT EXIST. SO THEY HAD TO GIVE THE ACTUAL NAME OF THE PERSON WHO MADE THE RECORDINGS.

 

[Sex Luthor]

Thinking of a hustle recently. If I was to use AI technology to create an artificial attractive women and create her a IG and an only fans for simps to donate to her account, is that illegal? I'm not technically using stealing another persons identity so; am I still breaking the law somehow?

Get on it now before there are any real laws on it. They might even name the law after you. The uncleTomFord virtual perversions law.

 

[newworldafro]

so you generate a fake face using AI, and paste it onto a real porn video deepfakes style?

if the face doesn't belong to any real person, that part is fine.

but i would think you could be violating the copyright of the person whose video you're pasting the face on. that could be an unauthorized modification for commercial purposes, it's definitely not fair use.

Right like if the person has a distinctive tattoo like that porn chick that had big ass Africa tattoo?

 

[invalid]

we need the finest coli lawyers in here on this @boy @Stringer Cochran @SirReginald come let us know

The fact that you mention me alongside @SirReginald got me dead to the bed.

I must really come off as a nut.

Nah, I've done some financial consulting for Breh & Breh Associates, but I'm not a lawyer.

 

[UncleTomFord15]

Get on it now before there are any real laws on it. They might even name the law after you. The uncleTomFord virtual perversions law.