Coli Military Experts: Do u feel U.S. would squash China if need be?

Obreh Winfrey

Truly Brehthtaking
Supporter
Joined
Nov 18, 2016
Messages
20,852
Reputation
25,879
Daps
132,072
Only if they ready to kill civilians.
shannon-sharpe-that-aint-no-problem.gif
 

Bonk

God’s Son
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,144
Daps
16,772
Reppin
In Da 15th
Wars aren’t fought on paper. Wars are always going to be fought on the ground unless nukes are allowed which means there will be no winners.

To the hypothetical war: you can’t win a war from the air - you still have to fight on the ground. And the number of manpower doesn’t always determine who wins a war - it’s about military doctrine, how well trained the combatants are, fire power, tactics and the morale of the soldiers when things get tough/rough.

I guess neither side has the advantage until it kicks off.
 

hatealot

Banned
Joined
Jan 22, 2017
Messages
13,656
Reputation
2,289
Daps
51,340
Wars aren’t fought on paper. Wars are always going to be fought on the ground unless nukes are allowed which means there will be no winners.

To the hypothetical war: you can’t win a war from the air - you still have to fight on the ground. And the number of manpower doesn’t always determine who wins a war - it’s about military doctrine, how well trained the combatants are, fire power, tactics and the morale of the soldiers when things get tough/rough.

I guess neither side has the advantage until it kicks off.
Sounds good in theory. But civilians need to die if you going against China.
 

Taadow

The StarchBishop™️
Joined
Sep 4, 2012
Messages
41,785
Reputation
10,456
Daps
104,088
Reppin
Crispness
Wars aren’t fought on paper. Wars are always going to be fought on the ground unless nukes are allowed which means there will be no winners.

To the hypothetical war: you can’t win a war from the air - you still have to fight on the ground. And the number of manpower doesn’t always determine who wins a war - it’s about military doctrine, how well trained the combatants are, fire power, tactics and the morale of the soldiers when things get tough/rough.

I guess neither side has the advantage until it kicks off.

Yeah. No matter how many airships you have, they still have to land.

China got the U.S. coming and going.
They make most of America’s chit, America still owes them bread (which makes you more fierce),
they little so it’s hard to grab them, and the Karate chit on deck.
Jackie Chan is 80 years old, and still fuccin’ niccas up.

I mean - if they wanted to really be about it, they can just tell all the Take Out Restaurants over here to poison the Fried Rice & General Tozo’s Chicken (word to Nore) and they can walk in here and take this country over in a month.

Again, this is all in my expert military opinion.
 

Arianne Martell

"Unbowed, Unbent, Unbroken"
Supporter
Joined
Jan 22, 2014
Messages
7,127
Reputation
965
Daps
24,552
Reppin
House Martell #SnakeGang #Targset
The US will rain utter terror. Our military hold back A LOT


The Chinese do. It have ONE base in the west while the US have strategize military bases throughout the world too. :mjlol:

and good luck with Chinese ships traveling to the west :mjlol:

common sense


Have you ever heard of a Chinese fighter pilot?
 

Tom Foolery

You're using way too many napkins.
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,932
Reputation
6,590
Daps
92,988
Reppin
Boardwalk and Park Place
Presumably through air? There's always been chatter that China has too much man power but how much does that matter in a future conflict when wars are no longer fought on ground.. :jbhmm:
Absolutely. Don't think for a second America won't flip the kill switch on China.
 

Bonk

God’s Son
Supporter
Joined
Jun 11, 2017
Messages
4,430
Reputation
1,144
Daps
16,772
Reppin
In Da 15th
Sounds good in theory. But civilians need to die if you going against China.

Civilians always die en masse in every war. It’s collateral damage and part of the game. But targeting them, especially with a population as huge as China’s would be a grave mistake. There’s a reason why propaganda is also a huge weapon of war.
 
Top