Coli smart nikkas, I got a question about A.I.

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

The random generation of numbers would be the A.I.'s undoing.

To put it simply: If you try to 'brute force' a password containing 8 random-digits, it would take a couple hundred years with the technology we have now and in the foreseeable future.​

 

[Tiffrock]

I fell asleep and came down, but why in TEH fukk would i ask smart nikkas about allen iverson?

Lol they could be sport smart...there's different types of smart.. (book,street ,techie,lol)

 

[Yung Pharaoh]

I could tell you about A.I. but i think Jadakiss can do it even better then me

>>

 

[Eddy Gordo]

In theory, but it is extremely, extremely unlikely

Mario
Chrome Dino
Chess to an extent

Have very predictable end states that are SET, for an AI the number of possible next moves and outcomes are not overwhelming

The potential combinations AND the fact that the end state (the outcome) is not SET, makes this a way, way, way, way, way harder thing to do

A limited amount of attempts and the fact that someone else could guess correctly (too) makes it even more less likely that an AI would help you win

One thing it could do better than a human though: analysis if historical data to guess the most likely sequence

But if the sequences are always genuinely random, it won’t help

I would assume they would try the DotA ai method. Where they ran mutiple sped up simulations where the ai would guess numbers from historical context. I'm assuming the numbers have some sort of pattern and after the millionth guess it might start to crack the code.

 

[Lifejennings]

Just the other day, I was listening to the AM station -

AI, that was providing customer service, answered the phone and had a full blown conversation with a caller:
-conversation flowed seamlessly
-acknowledged all the nuances/responded properly
-replied 'ok' when asked to hold on, etc.

The caller never knew that it wasn't a human on the other end.

To answer your question, yes, I think AI can follow sequences/patterns...even the rigged ones --->The Lotto.

Do you have a link?

 

[Lifejennings]

Depends.

If they use a computer to draw pseudorandom numbers, then yes an AI connected to a sufficiently powerful computer (or given sufficient time) could predict the outcome given enough data about previous numbers drawn.

If they do that shyt where they have the balls in the thing and the air sucks up one ball, then no.

Even with that there have to be different variables that could potentially be exploited right? I would think getting that data would be impossible. Like maybe you could exploit the fact that one ball weighs more than the others, and maybe that makes it be pulled more than other balls? Or maybe something about that mechanism that makes some numbers come up more often than others? Maybe something like that.

 

[BaldingSoHard]

Even with that there have to be different variables that could potentially be exploited right? I would think getting that data would be impossible. Like maybe you could exploit the fact that one ball weighs more than the others, and maybe that makes it be pulled more than other balls? Or maybe something about that mechanism that makes some numbers come up more often than others? Maybe something like that.

Scientists have long hypothesized that there are no truly random events. That if you knew the initial state of a system and could accurately map out all the forces impacting that system, that you could hypothetically predict the outcome of that system deterministically.

But with 30 or so bodies colliding with one another and the ridiculous number of vectors present in a wind vortex, it would be essentially impossible.

 

[Skooby]

:Skynet:

 

[Lady.Libra.]

Do you have a link?

It's AM radio 610 WIOD -
Broadcast was Friday, 5/11 @2:00pm
Host - Rush Limbaugh