Correcting some trivial misconceptions about ancient Africa

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,013
Reputation
7,902
Daps
93,393
I didn't find anything to critique between what I already knew, statements I didn't even know were misconceptions and stuff I'm not knowledgeable about enough to even have an opinion (for example, "Copper and its alloys had more value than Gold for most African societies").

I'd ask what he means by "there's little evidence for the diffusion of metallurgical technology" though.

What's his academical background?
 

GrindtooFilthy

World Class SuperVillain
Supporter
Joined
Feb 22, 2014
Messages
16,254
Reputation
3,123
Daps
43,479
Reppin
MA, CT, NH
I didn't find anything to critique between what I already knew, statements I didn't even know were misconceptions and stuff I'm not knowledgeable about enough to even have an opinion (for example, "Copper and its alloys had more value than Gold for most African societies").

I'd ask what he means by "there's little evidence for the diffusion of metallurgical technology" though.

What's his academical background?
That diffusion is the only that threw me off too, everything else seems kinda align with what we already knew

Is he talking about smithing multiple or different types of metal ore together?
 

FrontoBama

U Can’t Reach The Sun
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
2,409
Reputation
858
Daps
13,046
Reppin
Knicks & Dimes
He alone would know what he means but I’ve heard many Whites disparage the Benin Bronzes, calling them fake bronzes because many of them actually made of copper. (Important to note they were crafted separately over like 700 years)

The second part is just saying multiple African societies discovered iron working SEPERATELY rather than whats called a “heroic invention” where one sole person creates something and it spreads.

Very often if you leave the door open the White man will use it to say “oh it must have been [non blk] trade networks that brought this.“ They do that ALOT with Kush so I see why he did that.
 

Ake1725

All Star
Joined
Aug 3, 2017
Messages
2,553
Reputation
658
Daps
9,467
I didn't find anything to critique between what I already knew, statements I didn't even know were misconceptions and stuff I'm not knowledgeable about enough to even have an opinion (for example, "Copper and its alloys had more value than Gold for most African societies").

I'd ask what he means by "there's little evidence for the diffusion of metallurgical technology" though.

What's his academical background?
Probably referring to africans developing metallurgy independently vs it be brought to africans by outsiders would be my guess
 

Gritsngravy

Superstar
Joined
Mar 11, 2022
Messages
8,887
Reputation
809
Daps
18,139
Interesting information, got to gon head and put the 15 up for the Patreon library
 

MischievousMonkey

Gor bu dëgër
Joined
Jun 5, 2018
Messages
19,013
Reputation
7,902
Daps
93,393
He alone would know what he means but I’ve heard many Whites disparage the Benin Bronzes, calling them fake bronzes because many of them actually made of copper. (Important to note they were crafted separately over like 700 years)

The second part is just saying multiple African societies discovered iron working SEPERATELY rather than whats called a “heroic invention” where one sole person creates something and it spreads.

Very often if you leave the door open the White man will use it to say “oh it must have been [non blk] trade networks that brought this.“ They do that ALOT with Kush so I see why he did that.
For sure, that's a constant in African historiography, from mining techniques in Southern Africa to the centralization of the State on the continent. Always gotta disprove narratives that African "achievements" can't be indigenous.
 
Top