Cory Booker Introduces Bill to Give Judicial Branch Full Autonomous Authority Over US Marshalls

invalid

Veteran
Joined
Feb 21, 2015
Messages
20,281
Reputation
7,069
Daps
82,047

Screenshot-20250526-203225.png



Corey Booker introducing The Maintaining Authority and Restoring Security to Halt the Abuse of Law Act (MARSHALS Act)

Actual Bill:


Summary:

Purpose of the Bill (MARSHALS Act)

  • Proposed by: Senators Cory Booker, Chuck Schumer, Alex Padilla, Adam Schiff, and Representatives Eric Swalwell, Jamie Raskin, and Hank Johnson.
  • Goal: Move the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) from the executive branch to the judicial branch.
  • Reason: To prevent political interference—particularly by former President Trump—and protect judicial independence.

Motivation for the Legislation

  • President Trump and his administration have:
    • Disregarded and defied court orders.
    • Called for impeachment of judges who ruled against him.
    • Suggested the executive is not bound by court rulings.
  • There has been a rise in threats and intimidationagainst federal judges, including:
    • Harassment like unsolicited pizza deliveries.
    • Use of the name of Daniel Anderl, son of Judge Esther Salas, who was murdered.

Issues with Current Structure

  • The USMS reports to the Attorney General, who answers to the President, creating a conflict of interest.
  • Judges are concerned that the President could direct USMS to stop protecting them or ignore court orders.

Key Provisions of the MARSHALS Act

  1. Establish a U.S. Marshals Board, modeled after the U.S. Capitol Police Board.
  2. Chief Justice(in consultation with the Board) selects:
    • USMS Director
    • Marshals for each judicial district.
  3. Marshals maintain their law enforcement functions (e.g., pursuing fugitives, finding missing children) with judicial oversight and AG consent.

Support and Endorsements

  • Backed by organizationslike:
    • Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW)
    • Court Accountability
    • Demand Justice
    • Fix the Court
    • People for the American Way
    • Public Citizen
  • Supporters arguethe bill:
    • Strengthens checks and balances.
    • Shields judges from executive retaliation.
    • Protects judicial independence and the rule of law.

Notable Quotes

  • Sen. Booker: "We must move the Marshals to the judiciary to avoid a constitutional crisis."
  • Rep. Swalwell: "We cannot let a lawless president control the safety of judges hearing his cases."
  • Rep. Raskin: "This is about protecting democracy and judicial independence."

Bottom Line

The MARSHALS Act seeks to insulate the U.S. Marshals Service from political manipulation by placing it under judicial—not executive—control. Lawmakers cite escalating threats and Trump-era abuses as urgent reasons for reform to safeguard the judiciary and uphold the rule of law.
 

TRUEST

Superstar
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,229
Reputation
3,084
Daps
57,458
Reppin
NULL
They need to plaster every where the current score of the government so the public knows that the democrats are x amount of seats away from being majority in either senate and/or the house.

If the democrats don’t control at least one of those branches ain’t nothing happening. Y’all mods need to sticky this sh1t.
 

pawdalaw

Superstar
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
8,676
Reputation
2,265
Daps
28,366
Reppin
Fayetteville
About time that guy did something besides sit ins and holding marathon speeches. A whole lot of power rests upon whoever the Marshalls answer too. It’s a good way to pivot the entirety of law enforcement.
 

Vandelay

Life is absurd. Lean into it.
Joined
Apr 14, 2013
Messages
25,311
Reputation
6,898
Daps
91,243
Reppin
Phi Chi Connection
what if republicans pack the court with trump ideologues?
I think the reason judges are still by and large ordering in favor of the constitution because no judge wants their power invalidated.

This is a good move, but I'm pretty sure if they successfully execute this, MAGA still gonna ignore orders or marshals may ignore the orders themselves because a lot of them are MAGA. LEO is more MAGA than the judiciary. LEO lends itself ideologically to MAGA.
 
Top