Damn what does it take to get a decent bowl game brehs

No..Money..Mo..Problems

it is what it is
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
17,225
Reputation
-2,980
Daps
47,718
Reppin
Worldwide
It was a shytty year in college football there was like 4-5 good teams and than everybody else was garbage. Unfortunately 2 of those good teams (OSU, Stanford) dropped the ball cuz if they would of gotten in it would of been lit, Bama vs OSU and Clemson vs Stanford :whoo:
 

Darealtwo1

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
26,709
Reputation
-8,941
Daps
87,411
Honestly....you gotta make the committee ignore "fluke" wins. Like I thought that was the whole point of the new committee instead of having computers and polls because we can clearly see this shyt. Clearly OSU was a better team than MSU. Clearly Michigan should have beat MSU if their punter didn't muff a punt with 10 seconds left. How can you count that as a "win".

Who did Fraudowa face to become the 5th best team in the nation......
Capture.png


Like The committee is horrible...Worst bowl's ive seen in a long time.

Bama, OSU, Clemson, Stanford should have been the final 4.
 

The_Sheff

A Thick Sauce N*gga
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
26,167
Reputation
5,153
Daps
120,170
Reppin
ATL to MEM
Remove Bowl Tie-ins

Best Bowl game was the Pinstripe Bowl

You will never get conferences or the bowls to remove all bowl tie-ins. You would end up in a situation where a non traditional power school does well one season and earns a trip to a decent bowl. But since there is no automatic tie in if that school doesn't travel well the bowl would skip them and select a much worse team because their fans travel well. The bowl committees are in the business of selling tickets and hotel rooms first and foremost, a competitive game is just a plus.
 

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
201,748
Reputation
20,804
Daps
509,868
Honestly....you gotta make the committee ignore "fluke" wins. Like I thought that was the whole point of the new committee instead of having computers and polls because we can clearly see this shyt. Clearly OSU was a better team than MSU. Clearly Michigan should have beat MSU if their punter didn't muff a punt with 10 seconds left. How can you count that as a "win".


.
Cause it was a win breh :dahell:

I understand the eye test and everything but you can't just look at a team after beating another and say they aren't better, that's just retarded
 

Darealtwo1

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
26,709
Reputation
-8,941
Daps
87,411
Cause it was a win breh :dahell:

I understand the eye test and everything but you can't just look at a team after beating another and say they aren't better, that's just retarded

so you really thought MSU was a better team than Michigan after that game :francis:
 

Darealtwo1

Veteran
WOAT
Joined
Jan 9, 2014
Messages
26,709
Reputation
-8,941
Daps
87,411
I did after Michigan got their ass blasted by the same Ohio State team Mich St beat

Then clearly you must not know CFB....
First I said after that game....I said nothing about OSU.



OSU lost because Urban didn't give the ball to Zeke. If you can't see that then IDK what to tell you.
 
Top