Secure Da Bag
Veteran
@ Answering the question with a question...
I'll engage, I got time today...
1. Government propping up those who cant compete isnt a basic tenet...
2. No again, how do taxpayers/consumers lose? simple question.
3. result of government intervention
4. the fukkery of government intervention being used to justify more government intervention.
5. I dont believe a monopoly on American agriculture is possible without goverment intervention... worse case scenario is american ag falls victim to foreign ag
6. Tax dollars not being used to prop up unsustainable/failing businesses/industries is a win in my opinion.
If gov't intervention never occurred, then yeah, I could agree with your points. But gov't intervention has occurred and has given Big Agro such an advantage in AG that small farmers can't compete, much less maintain without gov't intervention. Taking it all away makes things worse not better. Market isn't going to reset. It's just going to become an oligopoly, sooner than later, if we go with your idea.
Last edited: